Among many similar globalist states, The UK State is a public-private partnership between government, financial institutions, multinational corporations, global think tanks, and well funded third sector organisations, such as so callednon governmental organisations(NGO’s) and large international charities.
Through a labyrinthine structure of direct funding, grant making and philanthropy, the UK State is a cohesive globalist organisation that works with selected academics, scientific institutions and mainstream media (MSM) outlets to advance a tightly controlled, predetermined narrative.
This designed consensus serves the the interests and global ambitions of a tiny group of disproportionately wealthy people.
This group of parasites, often misleadingly referred to as the“elite,”exploit all humanity for their own gain and to consolidate and enhance their power. Theycontrol the money supplyand the global debt, which is a debt owed to them.
Human beings are forced to pay tax which, via government procurement, flows directly to the private corporations they own.War, security, infrastructure projects, education and health care provide profits and are used by theparasite classto socially engineer society.
Globally, they fund all political parties, with any realistic chance of gaining power, theyown the MSMand spend billions lobbying policy makers.
Through think tanks and the actions of“independent”political activists, such as theFPAction Network, they directly fund political campaigns in exchange for the politician’s loyalty to them, not to the electorate.
Through their tax exempt grant making foundations, such as theBill and Melinda Gates Foundation(BMGF), they control the scientific, medical and academic orthodoxy.
This global network of oligarchs is moving towards the final stages of its long held plan to construct a single global system of governance. Often referred to as theNew World Order(NWO), it is a collaboration between supranational political organisations, like the United Nations andthe European Union, controlled scientific authorities, such as theIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC) and the World Health Organisation (WHO), global financial institutions, including the World Bank, IMF, ECB andBank for International Settlements(BIS), globalist organisations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), NGO’s like the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and policy making thinks tanks such as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Club of Rome and the Trilateral Commission.
The UK State is one, prominent tentacle of the emerging global governance system. It has capitalised on the COVID 19 crisis to create the conditions for a new global economic and political model. While COVID 19 appears to be a nasty strain of the common coronavirus, in Part 2 we will discuss how the UK State has spun a fake narrative about the disease to further the interests of it’s globalist, oligarch masters. Managing a response to a pandemic is merely the deceptive justification for the planned re-engineering of society.
In partnership with Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and the BMGF, the WEF were chief architects ofEvent 201which plotted, in quite precise detail, the global lockdown and the world’s media response to a global coronavirus pandemic. Event 201 was staged merely a matter of months before a global coronavirus pandemic broke out. Both the government lockdown and MSM response have proceeded exactly as they predicted.
To say this is all just a coincidence, and not worthy of further scrutiny, is beyond obtuse. The WEF’s extensive and detailedCOVID 19 Action Platformwas up and runningon March 12th 2020. The day after the WHO declared a global COVID 19 pandemic.
It is clear from the WEF’s own words, that they see COVID 19 as a fantastic opportunity. They state:
The Covid-19 crisis, and the political, economic and social disruptions it has caused, is fundamentally changing the traditional context for decision-making…….As we enter a unique window of opportunity to shape the recovery, this initiative will offer insights to help inform all those determining the future state of global relations, the direction of national economies, the priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the management of a global commons.”
This is a proposal for global governance which supersedes national sovereignty. It is as simple as that.
It is remarkable that there are still so many who accuse any who point to this long standing New World Order plan, extensively documented and spoken about by political leaders for generations, of being so calledconspiracy theorists. One wonders if these people can read.
Referencing the COVID 19 opportunities, one of the founders, and current executive chairman, of the WEF Klaus Schwab recently wrote:
A sharp economic downturn has already begun, and we could be facing the worst depression since the 1930s. But, while this outcome is likely, it is not unavoidable. To achieve a better outcome, the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions. Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a “Great Reset” of capitalism.
Capitalism requires a reset because the model ofclosed shopcrony capitalism, operated by the global parasite class for centuries, has reachedthe limits of growth. Therefore they need to create a new economic paradigm (the Great Reset) both to further centralise and consolidate their power and to fix their failing business model.
Following the 2008 banking collapse, while the people were forced to suffer austerity to bail out the banks with a form of highly selectivecronysocialism, the parasite class simply carried on piling up the debt.
In the Basel Capital Accords III, supposedly designed to stop the wild market speculations of banks which caused the collapse, they effectively reduced the liquidity (capital reserve) requirements for banks, allowing them to lend even more.
This process of allowing banks to create FIAT currency out of nothing has inevitably led to a global debt of approximately $260 trillion, which is more thanthree times the size of the planets GDP.
However, this is small potatoes compared to the scale of the financial products derivatives market. Estimated to be somewhere between$600 trillion to more than $1 quadrillion. While some say this is only thenotionalamount of the debt tied up in derivative contracts, the fact remains this is all debt.
Cumulatively, there isn’t enough productivity on Earth even to service the interest on these debts, let alone pay them. Ultimately this is debt owed to the oligarchs who control the world’ssystem of central banks. It is a Mickey Mouse system allowing monopolists to seize assets using their own funny money.
While the power to create all FIAT currency, out of nothing but debt creation, has afforded them immense economic and political control, 2008 demonstrated that their usury fraud can, and certainly will, collapse. Hence the Great Reset. Responding to a pandemic, orsaving lives, has nothing to do with it.
The process of transition, laid out by the WEF as the Great Reset, builds upon thesustainable development goalsof the U.N’s Agenda 2030. Founded upon the generationaleugenicist ideologyof the NWO oligarchs, the new global governance systemwill be a technocracy.
While Technocracy, rule by technocrats appointed or elected for their particular expertise, may sound appealing to some, the model proposed relies upon the destruction of nations states to be replaced by a distant global technocratic order that serves only the interests of its founding oligarchs and financial benefactors.
This technocratic system was outlined in 1974 by former US ambassador Richard N. Gardner, member of the CFR and the Trilateral Commission, in his articleThe Hard Road To World Order:
Never has there been such widespread recognition by the world’s intellectual leadership of the necessity for cooperation and planning on a truly global basis. Never has there been such an extraordinary growth in the constructive potential of transnational private organizations – not just multinational corporations but international associations of every kind in which like-minded persons around the world weave effective patterns of global action…
The hope for the foreseeable future lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction… but rather in… inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis… providing methods for changing the law and enforcing it as it changes and developing the perception of common interests…
In short, the “house of world order” will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down …
…but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.
Theinstitutions of limited jurisdiction, such as the IPCC and WHO, are already in place directing national government policy across the world. In Britain, it is the role of the UK State to deliver the obligatory policy changes in order to erode national sovereignty and create the global governance technocracy. All globalist states are essentially unconstitutional and treasonous.
Thecommon interest, determined by the technocrat class at the behest of their corporate oligarch paymasters, is currently replacing individual liberties and freedoms. The human being is becoming little more than aunitto be managed and directed and, where necessary, disposed of.
Inalienable human rights are being ignored utterly in pursuit of thecommon interest.
The global COVID 19 crisis is a catalysing event which has been misused to bring about the Great Reset. In order to convince the people to comply with their orders, the UK State has inculcated the population into a state of fear.
States around the world have practised social engineering using deception, by proselytising an unquestioning faith in an illusory form of science (scientism), behaviour modification, unlawful regulation and propaganda. They have used their obedient MSM to convince their peoples that the threat of COVID 19 is significantly greater than it actually is.
In Part 2 we will focus on the deception of the UK State. However, the same can be said for all other globalist states that have similarly responded to the claimed pandemic.
COVID 19 has been exploited in order to replace our inalienable human rights with an enforced obligation to obey public health orders.Public health has becomebiosecurityand there is no longer any such thing as a healthy human being. All humans are now biohazards and biohazards must be controlled or removed from society for thecommon good.
With the British people living in unwarranted fear, the UK State has been able to introduce draconiananti-democratic(quite literally) legislation.
In other circumstances this would have been impossible without significant revolt. Terrorising the public was essential to convince them to believe that the State had to remove all their rights and freedoms in order tokeep them safe.
Initially deceiving the public that the“emergency measures”would be temporary, furtherbehaviour modificationwas then used to force people to comply with a lengthening list of totalitarian regulations. The objective was to move people towards passively accepting the dictatorship of a surveillance state re-branded as“the new normal.”Thus far, it appears most people have been sufficiently frightened to meekly accept their enslavement.
Throughout the Great Reset transition, the public face of the globalist project has beenBill Gates. However, while Gates has used his wealth to seize control of global public health policy, he is just the current front man forWorld Order 2.0. It is the technological possibilities presented by the4th Industrial Revolutionwhich the architects of the world order are capitalising upon.
For example, while there is no evidence that COVID 19 can be spread by handling cash, theMSM have repeatedly floated the idea. This is no surprise. the BBC are among the many media organisationsdirectly funded by the BMGF.
Pilot schemes, such as the BMGF backedWest African Wellness Pass, are already underway. By linking biometric identification, along the lines of theBMGF funded, Rockefeller and U.N backed ID 2020, with cashless payment systems, all transactions can be centrally controlled in the rapidly approaching cashless society.
When your biometric identity includes your vaccine immunity status, there will be no necessity to legislate to make vaccines“compulsory.”Thus avoiding any contentious public debate. As long as you fully comply with your orders, you will be allowed controlled access to social and economic activity.
Systems likeimmunity passport and vaccine certificateswill be used to control freedom of movement, the right to work and to access services and the community. As described byworld order spokesmanBill Gates:
Eventually we will have some digital certificates to show who has recovered or been tested recently or when we have a vaccine who has received it.”
While vaccines may not be compulsory you won’t realistically be able to participate in society, employment, run a businessor receive benefits, without the appropriate vaccine or immunity status.
The BMGF have already invested more than $21 million in an MIT project to createa microneedle vaccine delivery systemthat will inject a reactive die under the recipients skin which can then be scanned by a reader. This pattern will act like an indelible bar code tattoo, enabling the global authorities to monitor and control your whereabouts and behaviour.
The New Zealand State has already decided to remove people from their homes andplace them in quarantine facilities(detention centres controlled by the military).
With an estimated population of 5 million andjust 22 alleged deathsfrom COVID 19 in the entire country (a population mortality risk of 0.0004%), and no deaths at all for nearly three months, clearly these measures are not a response to any genuine threat from COVID 19.
Having complete control over the testing and attribution ofdisease statusaffords the biosecurity State the power to potentially remove and detain its political enemies and dissenters without trial. Those ordered to enforce biosecurity, in the“new normal,”have exactly the same degree of authoritarian power that was invested in similar rights abusers such as the Gestapo and the Stasi. Does history ever teach us anything?
Thisquarantinepolicy in New Zealand is designed to maintain the level of fear and accustom the population to dictatorship. It also appears to be a provocation that may encourage insurrection and revolt. With a monopoly on violence and the use of force, violent uprisings invariably benefit the authoritarian State. It allows them to claim legitimacy for an even more oppressive“crack down.”
Thus far, the global response to COVID 19 has deviated little from the Rockefeller’s suggested Lockstep scenario in their 2010 reportScenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.
Like Event 201, this is another example of the quite extraordinary prescience of the people who form global governance policy. They can not only predict, in almost perfect detail, what the media will discover and report, but also nature itself.
Removing the“infected”from their homes and incarcerating them in detention centres mirrors the policy suggestion ofDr Michael Ryan from the WHO. While New Zealand is the first nominally democratic state to raid family homes and remove people by force, it certainly won’t be the last. The UK State has already given itself the power to do so in theHealth Protections (Coronavirus) Regulations 2020.
World economic activity will be administered by biosecurity States and based upon sustainable development goals. This new, centrally planned, global economy will be restricted only topermittedbusinesses.
Prior to his departure as governor of the Bank of England, in lockstep with the Great Reset,Mark Carney warnedthat companies that don’t follow the correct sustainability policies,“will go bankrupt without question.”In other words, lines of credit, without which business cannot hope to function, will be limited only to those who adopt theapprovedpolices.
This new economy will have very limited employment. Carney’s successor Andrew Bailey has already stated that it would be important not to keep people in“unproductive jobs”and that job losses, as a result of the COVID 19 crisis,were inevitable.
They would not have beeninevitablehad globalist State’s, like the UK, not responded to the crisis by shutting down the world’s productive economy.
The preposterous spin of the bankers and carefully chosen economists that the UK will simply bounce back from anunprecedented 20% drop in GDPis absurd. WithofficialUK unemployment of 2.7 million, more than doubling in a single year, these numbers are merely the tip of a very large, looming iceberg.
There are currently an additional estimated 7.8 million British workers furloughed. That scheme is due to end in a couple of months. The management consultancy firm McKinsey & Company estimate that7.6 million UK jobs are at risk.
This will, as ever, disproportionately impact the lowest paid, with analysis suggesting that more than 50% of those at risk of unemployment are already in jobs paying less than £10 per hour.
These are theunproductive jobsand livelihoods Bailey wants to get rid of. Across Europe and the Americas staggering levels of unemployment are seemingly unavoidable. It is not unreasonable to envisage at least6 million long term unemployedin the UK. With the same pattern common to many developed nations, the social, economic and health impacts of this are almost beyond comprehension.
Many have long been warning, that the toll taken by the Lockdown response to the supposed COVID 19 pandemic will be far worse than the disease itself. This awful prospect is becoming increasingly apparent.
There is no reason to believe official UK COVID 19 statistics, something we’ll discuss in Part 2. However, even if we accept that more than 41,000 people have died as a direct result of COVID 19, this sad loss is likely to be relatively inconsequential compared to the loss of life as a direct result of the UK State’s Lockdown policy.
It is important to recognise that the global lockdown response was a political choice made to create the economic condition for the Great Reset. It was not unavoidable, and there is no evidence that lockdowns make any difference to COVID 19 mortality. South Korea, Japan and Sweden did not impose full lockdowns and all have better COVID 19 outcomes that the UK.
Research by the UK Department of Health, the Office of National Statistics (ONS), the government’s Actuary Department and the UK Home Office estimates that200,000 people could dieas a result of re-orientating the NHS, to treat COVID 19 and little else, and from the economic effects of Lockdown polices. Unfortunately, this“worst case”scenario appears conservative.
An example of the derisory“scientism”used to terrorise the population, in April the University of Glasgowpublished a studyestimating average years of life lost (YLL) for individuals whoallegedlydied from COVID 19. Saying these wereallegeddeaths does not imply that no one died from COVID 19, only that we reallyhave no ideahow many.
Nonetheless, using quite bizarre methodology, the Glasgow researchers managed to calculate that the median YYL due to COVID 19 was 13 years for men and 11 years for women. This study was based upon analysis of the outbreak in Italy, but was citedby the UK MSMto scare the British. More than 59% of supposed COVID 19 decedents in Italywere over 80 years old.
Analysis from theNational Records of Scotland(NRS) shows that median age of death,supposedlyfrom COVID 19, was 81 for men and 85 for woman. Statistically indistinguishable from quite normal mortality.
The University of Glasgow researchers are funded by theWellcome Trustwho are the tax exemptphilanthropicfoundation of the multinational pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline. The University of Glasgow are also grant recipients of theCOVID 19 Therapeutics Acceleratorestablished by the Wellcome Trust, Mastercard and the BMGF.
The Wellcome Trust and the BMGF want the world to be vaccinated with their experimental COVID 19 vaccines. Despite the fact that decades of trying have failed to produce asuccessful vaccine against SARS, or indeed for any coronavirus strain, and that usually vaccine development takes at least 10 years, GSK and the BMGF are among those who, for some apparently inexplicable reason, are confident they can produce a successful vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 in a matter of months.
Obviously there is a huge conflict of financial interest at the heart of the University of Glasgow’s spurious claims about YLL’s. Pointing out this fact makes you aconspiracy theorist. Though ignoring it requires either a considerable degree of gullibility or a wilful intent to deceive.
Between 2001 and 2016economic and social deprivationin England consistently accounted for a genuinely alarming 9.3 year average reduced life expectancy (YLL’s) for males and, by 2016, shortened women’s lives by 7.4 years. The economic devastation that will be wrought by the entirely unnecessary Lockdown policy of the UK State, and others, measured in YLL’s, will dwarf those lost to COVID 19.
This is the price we will all pay for the parasite class’ determination to bring about the Great Reset and change the world’s economy and society to one centrally planned and controlled absolutely by them. They are currently spending billions globally on propaganda to convince us to accept their“new normal.”
They require our consent if their plans are going to work. This means, in order to scupper them, all we need to do is refuse to comply.While peaceful protest is an important unifying right, ultimately it is what we do every day that will make the difference. There is a nasty, fascist authoritarianism building in the UK, and elsewhere. Yet all we need to do in order to defeat it is refuse,en masse, to follow its orders.
Unfortunately, the UK State are among those throwing everything at convincing us to believe their frankly ridiculous, scientifically illiterate, COVID 19 propaganda narrative. We only need wander to the local supermarket and witness the faceless,muzzled majorityto know the deception is working.
We are faced with an existential choice. We can either give up any childish pretensions that we live in a free and open democratic society that values liberty and plurality of opinion, and accept the fascist dictatorial rule of a global technocratic parasite, or we can exercise conscious resistance and refuse to comply with the orders of the State.
In Part 2, we will dissect the mechanism of the UK State’s scamdemic. While Lockdown policies originate at a global level, by looking at how the UK State has implemented them, and the deception they have used to convince the public to accept them, the true nature of the scamdemic can be revealed.