Author: Schneider Electric
I love that consumers and enterprises alike are making an effort to include environmental sustainability in their buying decisions. There was a day when we used to rely purely on marketing claims when assessing product sustainability. Over time, this led to many “greenwashing” lawsuits and so, today, more and more companies are more careful with their claims.
Comparing products is something we all do whether it’s at the grocery store, car dealership, clothing store, or online. Sometimes we get it right, and sometimes we fall short. We usually get it right when buying food or drinks in terms of its calories, carbs, fats, etc. because these products have standardized nutrition labels. When products have a standardized label, we have a decent shot of making an informed buying decision. The good news is that many commercial products do have environmental labels and sustainability declarations based on globally recognized standards. The bad news is we’re still in the early days and there’s a lot of room for improvement. With that said, I believe that making the best decision starts with educating yourself with some foundational information.
The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) has three main types of labels and declarations that it governs. Type I labels communicate that a particular product or service meets or exceeds specific environmental criteria set by an independent third-party organization. Energy Star is an example of a Type I label. Type II labels are like Type I labels, except that the claims are self-declared, meaning a product manufacturer can apply whatever claim they wish without third-party verification. And finally, there are Type III environmental product declarations (EPD) which summarize the environmental life cycle data of a product. Like the nutrition facts label you use for food purchases, EPDs help you make product decisions based on a product’s environmental sustainability impact over its life.
While it’s great that most major manufacturers offer EPDs for their products, they don’t eliminate manufacturer mistakes or ensure valid comparisons. It’s still quite easy to choose a less sustainable product by incorrectly comparing EPDs from different manufacturers. Some key mistakes to watch out for include:
These are just a few of the mistakes made when comparing two or more EPDs. We understand that comparing products from a sustainability perspective is not as easy as it should be. That’s why we wrote the “Guide to Assess Commercial Product’s Sustainability”. One day we hope it’s much easier, but until then, this guide helps you navigate the pitfalls.
Author: Tom's Hardware Il settore degli smartphone pieghevoli si sta preparando per alcuni importanti aggiornamenti,…
Author: GAMEmag iRacing è spesso considerato un colosso nel settore delle simulazioni automobilistiche, distinguendosi per…
Author: Agemobile Apple lo scorso anno ha introdotto un nuovo Game Porting Toolkit per aiutare…
Author: IlSoftware Linux ha guadagnato popolarità negli ultimi decenni, specialmente tra sviluppatori, amministratori di sistema…
Author: Hardware Upgrade Guardate con invidia il vicino con il soffiatore per pulire il giardino…
Author: klatsch-tratsch Bill (l.) und Tom Kaulitz sind angeblich zwei der Promis eines geplanten "LOL"-Specials.…