The Titan Army P2712V leaves out a couple of things but delivers a sharp and colorful image, and excellent gaming performance. Flexibility is also included with its dual mode operation. It truly maximizes the price/performance ratio.
Pros
+
Very sharp and colorful image
+
Accurate out-of-box color
+
Premium video processing with low motion blur
+
Terrific value
Cons
–
No dynamic contrast option for HDR
–
No USB ports or internal speakers
Why you can trust Tom’s Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.
There’s never been a better time to buy one of the best 4K gaming monitors. With so many models to choose from and prices at historic lows, it’s almost a no-brainer. But, you say, won’t I have to upgrade my video card to maintain high frame rates? The short answer is yes, but there’s another way. Dual-mode monitors have appeared that, with the push of a button, double their frame rate while switching from 4K to FHD. Though you’re giving up pixel density in the process, it isn’t as dear when the screen is 27 inches.
A 27-inch 4K monitor delivers a tremendous pixel density of 163 ppi, which means the image is incredibly sharp with no visible dot structure. It’s great for close-in viewing, whether you’re gaming or working on your next Photoshop masterpiece.
There’s great value in this genre as well, and Titan Army is one of the leaders there. Its latest offering, the P2712V, delivers a 27-inch IPS screen with 4K at 160 Hz, Full HD at 320 Hz, Adaptive-Sync, HDR10, and wide gamut color. More importantly, it’s just $325, so let’s take a look.
Titan Army P2712V Specs
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Panel Type / Backlight
IPS / W-LED, edge array
Screen Size / Aspect Ratio
27 inches / 16:9
Max Resolution and Refresh Rate
3840×2160 @ 160 Hz
Row 3 – Cell 0
1920×1080 @ 320 Hz
Row 4 – Cell 0
FreeSync and G-Sync Compatible
Native Color Depth and Gamut
10-bit (8-bit+FRC) / DCI-P3
Row 6 – Cell 0
HDR10
Response Time (GTG)
1ms
Brightness (mfr)
350 nits SDR
Row 9 – Cell 0
400 nits HDR
Contrast (mfr)
1,000:1
Speakers
None
Video Inputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4
Row 13 – Cell 0
2x HDMI 2.1
Audio
3.5mm headphone output
USB
None
Power Consumption
33.6w, brightness @ 200 nits
Panel Dimensions
WxHxD w/base
24.2 x 16-20 x 7.7 inches
(614 x 406-508 x 196mm)
Panel Thickness
2.2 inches (57mm)
Bezel Width
Top/sides: 0.3 inch (8mm)
Row 20 – Cell 0
Bottom: 0.9 inch (22mm)
Weight
9.59 pounds (4.36kg)
Warranty
3 years
The P2712V starts with a 27-inch IPS panel sporting an edge backlight. Cost is kept down by leaving out a full-array LED and local dimming; neither is included. But brightness is solid at around 350 nits for HDR and SDR. There is no dynamic contrast in HDR mode, so the ratio remains around 1,000:1 across all content. You also get wide gamut color with a measured 93% coverage of DCI-P3. Accuracy is so good out of the box that I couldn’t improve the image with calibration.
Not too much has been sacrificed on the altar of value. There are aiming points, static and dynamic, sniper modes, night vision, frame counters, timers, alignment marks and solid video processing with a well-implemented overdrive. LED lighting accents the back of the panel with colorful vertical bands. And the stand is fully adjustable with solid ergonomics.
The dual mode switch takes a couple of button presses to execute, but once set up, you can quickly change between 4K at 160 Hz and Full HD at 320 Hz. You lose pixel density, of course, but at 27 inches, the P2712V has a sharper FHD picture than a 32-inch screen.
There are plenty of inputs for all the latest systems, PCs, and consoles. Two HDMI 2.1 and two DisplayPort 1.4 operate at full bandwidth, 3840×2160 at 160 Hz with Adaptive-Sync and HDR. You also get a headphone jack, but there are no USB ports.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom’s Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom’s Hardware’s best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Titan Army has always impressed me with its value. The P2712V’s bang-for-the-buck quotient is very high with little left out for $325 at this writing. Let’s check out some test results.
Assembly and Accessories
The P2712V’s plain brown wrapper is so subtle that you have to look at the stick-on label to know which model is inside. Once the crumbly foam is parted, you’ll find the base, upright, and panel securely packed. A small external power supply delivers the AC, and you get a heavy-gauge DisplayPort cable.
Product 360
Image 1 of 4
(Image credit: Titan Army)
(Image credit: Titan Army)
(Image credit: Titan Army)
(Image credit: Titan Army)
My apologies for the stock photos above; the P2712V doesn’t actually make characters climb out of the screen. The picture looks awesome, though, thanks to the packing of 8.3 million pixels into a 27-inch IPS panel. The anti-glare layer cuts reflections nicely without spoiling that razor-sharp image. A thin bezel extends past the picture by just a few millimeters, creating a flush and frameless look. Only a Titan Army logo appears at the bottom, which reminds me a bit of a mouth harp. You know, one of those thingies that twangs when you pluck it. At the lower right is a row of OSD control keys and a backlit power button.
The LED lights trim two sides of the P2712V’s backside, making a nice contrast to all the textures going on. The perimeter looks like carbon fiber weave, and the center section has a brushed finish. The base also has a carbon fiber look. The lighting can be controlled in the OSD with multiple color and effect options.
The upright features 5/20 degrees tilt and a 90-degree portrait mode. You also get a solid four-inch height adjustment. There is no swivel. Movements are firm with confident positioning, but there is a little wobble where the panel attaches to the stand.
Up and under, you’ll find four video inputs, two HDMI 2.1 and two DisplayPort 1.4. All operate at full resolution and 160 Hz with HDR and Adaptive-Sync. You also get a 3.5mm headphone jack with volume control in the OSD. There are no USB ports or internal speakers.
OSD Features
The P2712V’s OSD is the same one I’ve seen in all Titan Army monitors. It offers many options for picture adjustment, gaming aids, and video processing, but it is a bit clunky to operate. After a bit of back-and-forth, I figured it out.
Image 1 of 9
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)
The OSD appears when you press any key and has a purposeful look suited for gaming. Resolution and refresh rate are shown at the top of all screens. Starting with the TI menu, it has aiming points, night vision, and two sniper modes. It also has a dual-mode switch that changes between 160 and 320 Hz.
The P2712V has 12 picture modes, though it could be said there are 24, since each has a default and a custom memory. To keep confusion at bay, stick with Standard mode in its default configuration. It doesn’t need calibration, and in fact, tweaking provides no benefit. If you need sRGB, it’s on the second screen of mode choices. It too has default and custom modes and can be calibrated if you wish.
In Picture Settings, you can pick from multiple gamma and color temp presets or adjustable RGB sliders. I found them quite coarse in practice, so for me, they made no improvement. If you get lost in the settings, you can reset just this menu back to factory defaults.
Some of the TI options are repeated in the Game+ menu, and you also get aspect ratios, HDR modes (Auto, Game and Movie) and picture enhancements. That’s where you’ll find the overdrive, which works well on all its levels except Extreme, which caused ghosting on my sample. Here also is the frame counter, more crosshairs, a timer and stopwatch, and sniper mode. This menu too can be reset independent of the others, very handy. Game Illumination refers to the LED in the back, which can be configured for different colors and effects.
Titan Army P2712V Calibration Settings
My initial measurements of the P2712V were excellent. It doesn’t need calibrating in the Standard mode. It also works well in sRGB mode where you get accuracy suitable for color-critical tasks. The native gamut covers 93% of DCI-P3, so it will be oversaturated for SDR content but not in a way that anyone will object to. I tried calibrating the RGB sliders, but found they weren’t fine enough to make any improvement. Below are the brightness settings for commonly used peak levels. HDR signals get three of their own modes, Auto, Movie and Game. Testing showed that Movie was the best choice.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Picture Mode
Standard
Brightness 200 nits
58
Brightness 120 nits
29
Brightness 100 nits
22
Brightness 80 nits
15
Brightness 50 nits
5 (min. 36 nits)
Contras
50
Gamma
2.2
Gaming and Hands-on
To prepare the P2712V for dual-refresh operation, I started in 4K and set the rate in the Nvidia Control Panel to 160 Hz. There were no issues running at full honk for hours of gaming. The P2712V was completely stable. To set up 320 Hz, first activate the dual-mode option in the OSD. On means 320 Hz at FHD resolution. Then return to the Nvidia Control Panel and set the refresh rate to 320 Hz. In both modes, use level 3 for the overdrive. It removes nearly all motion blur and doesn’t cause ghosting. Extreme will add artifacts, so it’s best avoided. There is no backlight strobe feature here, but it isn’t necessary if you run 4K faster than 140 Hz. My setup uses a GeForce RTX 4090, so I ran steadily at 160fps.
Games like Doom Eternal proved to be very responsive; I could not detect any input lag. The picture is super sharp, whether moving or stationary. Fast camera pans don’t cause the smearing that calls out a lesser display. Titan Army’s video processing is very well done.
To switch refresh modes, I had to return to the Windows desktop. Activating dual-mode in a game usually ends in a visit to Task Manager to close the crashed program. This is true of all the dual-refresh monitors I’ve reviewed. At 320 Hz/FHD, the P2712V is very smooth with no visible motion blur. You won’t be wishing for backlight strobing. The overdrive should still be set to level 3. The loss of pixel density is certainly obvious, but not a major negative. It will be attractive to users with less powerful PCs that can’t maintain 160fps at 4K. When it comes to frenetic gameplay, smoothness beats sheer resolution.
The HDR image was colorful and bright, but not more dynamic than SDR. This is solely due to the P2712V’s lack of dynamic contrast. A field dimming option would be welcome here, but in fairness, it is far from the only screen with this deficiency. It supports HDR but doesn’t embrace it.
For everyday tasks, the P2712V is a great choice. Pixel density like this is super nice for photo and graphics work. There’s no visible pixel structure at close viewing distances; I’m talking about 18 to 24 inches away from the screen. Color accuracy is also good enough for critical tasks, especially if you need sRGB. Titan Army nails that mode.
My only complaint about the day-to-day operation of the P2712V is its OSD. The menu has some redundancies that are confusing. And it’s challenging to navigate with just buttons. I’m spoiled by joysticks, but I think they should come on every monitor, regardless of price.
Takeaway: The P2712V punches above its weight class in gaming performance with premium video processing, responsive play and refresh rate flexibility. It can serve equally well with high-end and mid-grade systems. HDR imagery is color accurate and well saturated, but lacks the depth of monitors with dynamic contrast, which is absent here. I’m not a fan of the OSD, but in fairness, you won’t have to use it much since calibration isn’t necessary. Overall, the P2712V gives you a lot to be happy about at a low price.
Christian Eberle is a Contributing Editor for Tom’s Hardware US. He’s a veteran reviewer of A/V equipment, specializing in monitors. Christian began his obsession with tech when he built his first PC in 1991, a 286 running DOS 3.0 at a blazing 12MHz. In 2006, he undertook training from the Imaging Science Foundation in video calibration and testing and thus started a passion for precise imaging that persists to this day. He is also a professional musician with a degree from the New England Conservatory as a classical bassoonist which he used to good effect as a performer with the West Point Army Band from 1987 to 2013. He enjoys watching movies and listening to high-end audio in his custom-built home theater and can be seen riding trails near his home on a race-ready ICE VTX recumbent trike. Christian enjoys the endless summer in Florida where he lives with his wife and Chihuahua and plays with orchestras around the state.
One of the best upgrades you can make to your home office is the addition of a monitor arm. A good-quality arm not only frees up usable space on your desk’s surface, it enables more ways to move and position your display/s for optimal comfort and ergonomics. And a monitor arm makes your office setup look really cool.
The only catch is the price. Most monitor arms worth buying will cost close to $200, and heavy-duty arms capable of holding two large displays can be priced even higher. The good news is that a good-quality monitor arm is likely to last you for a very long time. That’s why it’s important to make the right choice when you purchase a monitor arm.
To help you with that, we’ve tested several popular monitor arms, for both single- and dual-monitor setups. Below you’ll find our curated list of recommendations, with detailed explanations of what features and qualities make them stand out. We even have some good budget recommendations. Below our picks, we point out some arms that we aren’t so keen on — to provide a point of comparison.
Why you should trust PCWorld for monitor arm reviews and buying advice: It’s in our name! PCWorld has been covering PCs since 1983. That includes PC hardware of all types, including monitors and monitor accessories. All of our recommendations have been tested hands-on and vetted by our expert reviewers, who’ve applied not only performance benchmarks but rigorous usability standards.
The Ergotron LX Pro is a practical, effective, easy-to-use monitor arm. Ergotron achieves this ease-of-install with clever, yet simple, engineering.
The LX Pro’s clamp mechanism, which secures the monitor to a desk, takes the extra step of providing a comfortable handhold that makes it easy to work the clamp without tools. The arm’s two sections, meanwhile, simply slip into place. Ergotron also provides thumb screws for attaching the arm’s VESA mount to the back of your monitor.
Depending on your monitor, you may need to use the included hex wrench to tighten the components. Otherwise, installation doesn’t require tools.
The arm’s desk clamp mechanism is wide, which is important. Clamps with a small surface concentrate more force on your desk and cause damage if over-tightened. A wider clamp better distributes the force. That means the LX Pro is less likely to damage weaker desks (though caution when tightening the clamp is recommended).
Fortunately, the arm’s ease of installation doesn’t lead to functional downsides. The arm can support monitors up to 34 inches diagonally that weigh up to 22 pounds. The arm also lifts up to 13 inches, tilts up to 85 degrees, and can swivel and rotate to a full 360 degrees. Cables are routed through channels in the arm and secured by sturdy detachable cladding. Ergotron provides a 10-year warranty.
The LX Pro even fixes our gripes about its predecessor, the Ergotron LX. The LX Pro’s base is more compact, the white colorway now has a color-coordinated VESA mount, and the new design is more attractive. The only downgrade compared to the old Ergotron LX is a lower maximum weight (the LX could handle up to 25 pounds). But that’s unlikely to matter, as 32-inch and 34-inch monitors usually weigh 15 pounds or less.
The LX Pro’s $209 MSRP is enough to make shoppers think twice, but it’s great value for money. The arm’s overall build quality feels competitive with more expensive monitor arms, such as the Humanscale M2.1.
That makes the Ergotron LX Pro an easy recommendation. It’s simple to set up, looks nice, works well in day-to-day use, yet remains affordable. We already liked the Ergotron LX, but the LX Pro is a great upgrade.
The MSI MAG MT201 is an inexpensive monitor arm that’s rated to support 49-inch screens that weight up to 44 pounds. That’s high enough that it’s unnecessary; even my 42-inch LG B4 television weighs only 25 pounds. The MAG MT201 has a spring (rather than gas or gas-spring hybrid) tension system that proved capable of handling the 32-inch monitors I had on hand.
Setting up the MAG MT201 is a bit complicated. The stand’s assembly requires multiple steps and tightening numerous screws. Tools are provided, but it will take about 15 to 20 minutes to finish. This is something that separates the MAG MT201R from more expensive arms, like the top-rated Ergotron LX Pro. The steps required to assemble each monitor arm are similar, but the MT201 requires more screws, and some screws in awkward positions.
Adjusting the monitor is less difficult. The arm itself felt sturdy and swivels left and right, as well as up and down, without trouble. You’ll want an Allen-head screwdriver handy, though, as several adjustments including the monitor arm neck and height tension require it. The arm includes a quick-release VESA mount, meaning you can detach a monitor from it by removing a single thumb-screw. It’s a nice feature to have on a budget arm.
Aside from a prominent MSI logo, the monitor arm looks sleek, professional, and reserved, and could work equally well for a home office or a gaming setup. Build quality isn’t amazing, with plastic cladding over metal framing, but it’s a looker for a budget monitor arm. It’s better than the industrial look of the Monoprice monitor arm (our former budget pick) and more distinctive than budget arms from Huanuo and Vivo. The MAG MT201 also delivers a massive gain in quality over arms in the $25 to $50 bracket, most of which are less adjustable and even more difficult to set up.
Price works in the MSI MAG MT201’s favor. It carries an MSRP of $99.99, but it’s often on Amazon for around $60 to $80, with an all-time low price of $49.99. That makes the MSI MAG MT201 feel like the minimum viable monitor arm. Buying anything less expensive doesn’t make sense, as you’ll sacrifice too much in quality and design.
Huanuo HNSS6 Single Monitor Arm – Best monitor arm under $50
The Huanuo HNSS6 Single Monitor Arm is easily our go-to recommendation for shoppers looking to buy the least expensive monitor arm that can still fulfill its job.
The arm comes in two pieces: The lower portion swivels while the upper portion allows for height, tilt, and rotation adjustments. A gas spring provides tension to keep monitors aloft, which is an upgrade from the clips and screws used by the least expensive arms. However, it’s worth noting that gas springs can lose their potency over time. These features are typical for the price: Most competitors are similar in design and use a gas cylinder.
What makes the Huanuo a winner is its overall quality and ease of install. Setup required installation of just three screws (and adjustment to a couple more). The clamp used to mount the arm to the desk was intuitive compared to rivals like the MountUp Single Monitor Arm, as the spacing of the clamp is adjustable without removing and re-installing screws to secure it. The arm claims to hold 32-inch displays up to 20 pounds, which is enough to hold most monitors. We tested it with panels up to 32 inches weighing up to 12 pounds, and it supported those with ease.
One notable downside is cable management. The plastic covers provided are finicky and won’t hold many wires, so if you want to add USB cables in addition to a video connection and power, you’re probably out of luck. To be fair, though, the same is true of most inexpensive arms.
The Huanuo wasn’t as easy to set up or adjust as the Ergotron LX, our favorite overall pick, and it’s not as sturdy as the Monoprice Single Monitor Arm, which typically sells for $60. Still, the Huanuo gets the job done.
Want a monitor arm that gets the job done and looks good doing it? The Herman Miller Flo is for you.
The Flo’s design sets it apart from the pack. Herman Miller ditches the angular, industrial design of many competitors for a smooth, natural look. While clearly designed for a corporate office, it also fits in with a home office setup, where its friendly, approachable look helps it blend in with its surroundings. The Flo is backed by a 12-year warranty and offers 24/7 customer service.
It’s easy to set up and use. The monitor’s clamp works similarly to other monitor arms I tested, but it’s more refined and requires fewer screws (a grommet is also available). The VESA mount is also excellent, providing a simple clip design that’s secure and can be easily pre-mounted to a monitor for simple installation. The way this mount works accommodates monitors that have a slightly recessed mount position, which may cause problems for other monitor arms.
The monitor’s range of adjustment isn’t much different from other high-end monitor arms. It offers 13.3 inches of vertical adjustment, 80 degrees of tilt, and 360 degrees of swivel and rotation. That’s essentially identical to the less expensive Ergotron LX. The Flo’s operation is smoother, however: I found I could adjust a monitor’s height with a mere nudge.
Surprisingly, the Flo has a listed weight limit of 20 pounds and recommends use with monitors weighing at least 7 pounds. Most monitors fit within this range, but some heavier models won’t be compatible with the Flo.
Herman Miller lists the Flo at $295, which is a lot to ask for a single-monitor arm. The Ergotron LX offers similar features at a much lower price. However, the Flo is a smoother, more appealing monitor arm, and worth the upgrade if you want form with your function.
It’s natural, given the only slight difference in name, to think the Ergotron HX is merely an uprated version of the Ergotron LX. That’s not the case. This is an entirely different monitor arm which pairs its increased capacity with improved build quality and a more professional look.
First, let’s talk weight. The Ergotron HX is rated to hold monitors that weigh up to 42 pounds and screen sizes up to 49 inches. That’s an extraordinarily high weight limit—I haven’t reviewed a single monitor in 2023 that exceeds it. I attached both a 32-inch widescreen and 38-inch ultrawide monitor, which weighed roughly 15 and 20 pounds, respectively, and the HX easily handled both.
The use of plastic is minimal and reserved for small portions of cladding that appear used only for cable routing. The arm’s moving parts include larger, sturdier mechanisms, and felt extremely smooth in my use. Ergotron backs the arm with a 10-year warranty.
The monitors range of adjustment is a bit limited compared to the LX. It offers 11.5 inches of height, 75 degrees of tilt, 180 degrees of swivel, and 360 degrees of rotation. However, a somewhat more limited height adjustment is typical in this category due to the size of monitors these stands are expected to carry.
The monitor arm’s impressive design also provides a more robust look. This could be a con for some, however, as the arm can seem a bit…much in a home office setup. It’s an expensive arm, as well. Expect to pay about $350.
The Ergotron HX is an obvious choice if you want to mount an ultrawide, super-ultrawide, or large format widescreen monitor on your desk.
Humanscale M2.1 with M/Connect – Best monitor arm w/ built-in dock
The Humanscale M2.1 with M/Connect laptop docking station is an attractive, robust, and modern monitor arm that can expand your laptop’s connectivity without taking up additional space on your desktop.
Humanscale’s entry-level M2.1 doesn’t include a laptop dock, but it’s designed to accommodate the M/Connect 3, which nestles snuggly into the base of the arm. Most home office shoppers will likely choose the M/Connect 3 USB Data Hub, which currently retails for $253 (on top of the M2.1’s base price of $356). The hub adds three USB-C ports and two USB-A ports. If you want even more ports, the $600 M/Connect 3 Pro Dock adds two more USB-A ports, two more USB-C, Ethernet, and two DisplayPort ports.
The M/Connect 3’s added connectivity is an excellent way to expand the ports on a laptop. Its central location makes the ports easy to access and keeps them firmly located in a set position on your desk (as opposed to freestanding hubs and adapters, which tend to get shoved around, or off, a desk). It’s also a good alternative to a USB-C monitor. We like USB-C monitors, but packing connectivity into the monitor can make it difficult to access some ports, as most are located on the rear of the display.
Connectivity aside, the Humanscale M2.1 is a robust, if conventional, monitor arm. It can handle monitors between 5 and 15 pounds, which is enough to support the vast majority of widescreen monitors under 32 inches in size. It also has a “smart stop” feature, which lets users customize the amount of rotation the arm allows, and easy-to-use quick release joints that are handy when disassembling or moving the arm. The arm isn’t as smooth in operation as the Herman Miller Flo, but it remains easy enough to adjust.
Ergotron LX Dual Monitor Arm – Best dual monitor arm
Two monitors are always better than one, and the same goes for monitor arms. It’s no surprise, then, that Ergotron’s LX Side-by-Side ranks as our best dual monitor arm. The Ergotron LX Side-by-Side pairs two LX monitor arms together on one mount. The look, feel, and specifications of each arm are close to its standalone sibling.
Monitor size is one exception: While the standard LX is rated for monitors up to 34 inches, the Side-by-Side’s arm is only rated for monitors up to 27 inches. The monitor arms aren’t long enough to fit two 32-inch or 34-inch monitors side-by-side. Vertical arrangements are also supported, though only if one of the two monitors is small (less than 23 inches diagonal).
Look and feel is otherwise similar to the standard Ergotron LX, and that’s why the dual monitor arm also earns a recommendation. The dual-monitor arm provides the same winning balance of build quality, adjustability, and smooth operation, and it’s backed by the same 10-year warranty. Pricing is a bit higher at $330, which is a slight savings compared to buying two LX arms individually.
Workstream by Monoprice Dual Monitor Arm – Best budget dual monitor arm
The same logic that applies to our favorite dual monitor arm also to the budget model, giving Monoprice’s Workstream Dual Monitor Arm a clear path to victory.
In fact, the dual arm’s pricing is even more impressive. The Workstream Dual Monitor is four times less expensive than the Ergotron LX Side-by-Side. I’m a bit shocked by the quality Monoprice can offer at a $100 price point. Ergotron’s alternative is more attractive and easier to use, but is it four times better? That’s a tough call.
The Workstream’s downsides are identical to standard model. Build quality is impressive for the price, but the arm is difficult to set up and not as smooth in operation. I’m also doubtful the arm is capable of handling two 20-pound monitors, as its spec sheets claim. Fortunately, 27-inch monitors (the largest this arm can handle side-by-side) usually weigh less than 10 pounds, so weight capacity shouldn’t be an issue.
The Huanuo HNDS12 represents a middle ground for shoppers who want an upgrade in quality but need to respect their budget.
Each monitor arm is almost all metal with only a small piece of plastic to provide cable routing. The arm also has gas springs capable of lifting up to 26 pounds of weight, which is enough to handle 32-inch widescreen and 34-inch ultrawide monitors.
There’s one unusual feature: a USB hub. This includes two USB ports that are placed at the front of the arm base. Each of these will need to plug in to your computer, which might be a problem if you have a laptop with just a few ports, but it’s a functional bonus.
The Huanuo HNDS12, like the HNDS6 (below), is a bit fiddly to set up. It has two clamps that need to be adjusted and roughly a dozen screws that need to be installed. The gas springs also require a bit of adjustment to reduce the force provide, at least when used with a 24-inch or 27-inch monitor.
Still, the HNDS12 is a good pick at its regular retail price of $140, which often drops as low as $110 when on sale. It looks attractive and offers plenty of force for holding larger monitors.
The Clearspace Uni-2’s design is a bit different from most competitors. It places two individual arms on a single pole. Each arm can adjust for height, swivel, and tilt, and each monitor mounts to an “independent slider” which can move right or left, making it easier to tune the placement of each monitor relative to the other. Compared to the Humanscale M8.1, I found the Uni-2 easier to adjust. However, the Humanscale M8.1’s beefy crossbar is likely to prove more stable if you’re mounting large monitors.
I think the Clearspace Uni-2 looks great, and that’s important. Competitors from Humanscale and Herman Miller also look luxurious but have a more corporate or “executive’s office” vibe. The Uni-2’s softer look feels more appropriate for a home office. Clearspace also provides black, silver, and white colorways, and every component of each colorway is molded in the promised color (which isn’t true of most competitors). Clearspace also throws in subtle touches, like soft-touch inserts on the side of each monitor arm. That’s the kind of design a home office user will appreciate.
Clearspace also looks to separate itself with connectivity. The Uni-2 comes standard Smart Hub that provides a single USB-A and USB-C port. That’s a small edge over competitors, which often sell the dock as an upgrade. Owners can improve the basic hub with the optional SmartDock (pictured), which expands connectivity to include additional USB ports, HDMI, and Ethernet. Unfortunately, I can’t recommend it: The SmartDock is priced at $650 yet lacks support for features I’d expect at that price, like 4K 60Hz video and 2.5Gbps Ethernet.
While the optional SmartDock is a miss, the arm is a winner. The Clearspace Uni-2 is expensive, but the price can be justified if you’re picky about the look and feel of your home office space. Clearspace also offers a single-monitor and triple-monitor arm: While I didn’t test them, I expect they’d offer similar perks.
The MSI MPG MT201R is a heavy-duty monitor arm that’s rated to support 49-inch screens that weigh up to 44 pounds. It supports that weight with a gas spring mount. While that might sound like a lot, you shouldn’t think it makes the arm any more durable than another. Most monitors, even large ones, weigh less than 25 pounds, anyway.
Unboxing and setting up the MPG MT201R can take a while, as the stand comes in numerous parts connected by numerous screws. The tools are provided, and the included assembly guide is clear enough, but more expensive monitor arms usually ship with fewer parts. The monitor includes a VESA quick release feature that makes it easy to attach or detach a monitor by removing a single thumb screw.
The C-Clamp plate is broad and the base of the stand is also large. Together, these make for a very secure fit that is less likely to damage a desk, because the load of the clamp’s force is spread out more evenly.
MSI’s branding is prominent, and I don’t think that’s a plus. The monitor arm will only look “right” with an MSI MPG monitor. Even then, I don’t think MSI’s design across its product line is coherent enough to justify buying an MSI arm to go with an MSI monitor. On the plus side, the arm has RGB lighting which runs through the arm itself. The lighting is powered by USB-A. It doesn’t sync with other devices, but it looks nice.
Pricing is a bit awkward. The MSI MPG MT201R has an MSRP of $129.99 and often sells at that price, though it’s occasionally reduced to $99.99. That’s fair, but aside from the RGB lighting, I don’t think the MPG MT201R adds much value over a less expensive arm like the MSI MAG MT201 or the Workstream by Monoprice monitor arm. I’m also not sold on the design, which seems meant to appeal only to MSI super-fans.
The Huanuo TitanLift’s name implies it’s a heavy-duty monitor arm, and it delivers. Huanuo doubles down on “heavy duty” with thick components mostly made of metal and has a big, secure base. If you like your trucks with lots of diamond-cut plating, or you think flannel shirts are the last word in functional fashion, this arm is for you.
But it’s not all just for show. The arm claims to hold up to 40 pounds, which is a lot—the heaviest display I have weighs in at about 30 pounds and it’s a TV. You’ll be hard pressed to find a monitor, even a 49-inch super-ultrawide, that comes close to the arm’s weight limit. There’s also a wide range of ergonomic adjustment. In addition to height adjustment the arm provides 50 degrees of tilt, 90 degrees of swivel, and 360 degrees of rotation. Adjustment is a bit stiff out of the box but can be loosened with an included Allen wrench.
We generally like the Huanuo TitanLift and can recommend it when the arm is on sale for about $20 less than its competitors, such as the MSI MAG MT201, though a few minor points prevent it from earning a broader recommendation.
Setting up the monitor arm is a chore. You’ll need to install multiple screws and the base uses two clamps, each of which must be screwed to the base individually. The tilt mechanism is a bit odd, too. When tilting up it feels a bit loose until it clicks into place, after which the mechanism feels tight. It works, but it’s not as smooth as it could be.
These shortcomings are minor, though, and we enjoyed our time with the arm. The MSI MAG MT201 is slightly easier to set up and looks a bit nicer, but the Huanuo TitanLift is a reasonable alternative. Both arms are a good pick at their sub-$100 price points.
The MSI MPG MT161R is an affordable single monitor arm built for gamers who want something with some flair. It has a spring mechanism that can support screens up to 45 inches that weigh up to about 35 pounds.
Design is what sets the MPG MT161R apart. It uses plastic cladding to create a dramatic, mechanical look with sharp edges and a bit of red trim. The centerpiece, however, is undoubtedly the monitor arm’s base. It uses RGB lighting and reflective material to create a fun hall-of-mirrors effect. The lighting is powered by USB-A.
The extensive use of plastic cladding over the arm’s metal components is not to the arm’s credit, however. It feels spindly and inexpensive. To be fair, it’s an affordable arm with an MSRP of $109.99—but I think a price around $75 would be more in line with the quality of the arm. While the RGB lighting is fun, it’s limited to the base of the arm and doesn’t sync with other devices.
Setting up the arm is a bit finicky. The arm ships in numerous pieces and requires installation of numerous screws. Tools are included, and the assembly manual is adequate, but it’s annoying. The monitor includes a quick-release VESA mount which allows a monitor to be removed or reattached using a thumbscrew.
While I appreciate MSI’s attempt to design an arm that looks different, it’s hard to recommend the result. Many less expensive arms are at least as functional and the design, though unique, doesn’t seem worth much of a premium. I can only recommend it if you fancy the arm’s look.
The MountUp MU0004 Single Monitor Arm seems like an even more affordable alternative to the Huanuo HNSS6. They look similar in photos, and each has a gas spring. However, the MountUp’s lower price — usually $5 to $10 less than the Huanuo — comes with some compromises.
The MountUp arm was more difficult to install. This is due to the clamp, which has a two-piece design that requires screws be removed and re-installed when adjusting the clamp’s size. Adjustment of the clamp was also a bit more difficult, as turning the knob required more force, and the clamp lacks a rubberized pad to prevent it from marking the underside of your desk. We also didn’t like the MountUp’s fit and finish. It had a coarse, matte feel that seemed more industrial than the Huanuo, and miles behind the Ergotron LX.
It’s not all bad news. MonutUp says the monitor arm can support 32-inch displays up to 17 pounds. That’s rather heavy for a modern monitor, and it easily handled a 32-inch display weighing 12 pounds. While inferior to the Huanuo, the MonutUp could work if you don’t mind fiddling with a few more screws during installation and can overlooks is lackluster build quality.
Still, it’s hard to justifying paying $30 for the MonutUp if you can bug the Huanuo for $40 (or even $50). A monitor arm can last for years, so spending a few extra bucks for a better experience makes sense.
At the time we bought it for testing, the Vivo STAND-V002 was ranked as the second best-selling monitor arm on Amazon. That’s a shame, because it’s easily the worst arm we’ve tested so far.
To be fair, it’s also the least expensive. The STAND-V002 is typically sold below $30. That’s less than many top-selling single monitor arms! Vivo achieves that by cutting the arm’s features to the bone.
Adjustability is minimal, so much so that Vivo (mostly) advertises the STAND-V002 as a “desk mount” or “stand” instead of an arm. It has a clamp, a pole, and two jointed arms that attach to the pole at a single point. You can adjust the monitors for height, but only together: One can’t be higher than the other. The arms, meanwhile, have joints that allow swivel and adjustment side-to-side, as well as tilt up and down. You can’t adjust these on-the-fly, though, because everything is tensioned by screws that must be loosened with a tool, adjusted, and then re-tightened to keep the monitors in place.
Build quality is poor. Vivo claims the arms can hold two monitors up to 22 pounds each, but we noticed a slight deflection downward even when attaching a 27-inch display weighing 10 pounds. Cable management is provided by plastic clips that are barely adequate to the task and tend to fall off when jostled. The clamp is small and lacks a rubber pad, so it could mark softer woods and materials.
We suppose the Vivo could work if you plan to mount a couple 24-inch monitors and don’t care about adjusting them once in place, but it’s otherwise not worth $30. It’s cheap, sure — but in our experience, monitor arms this cheap tend to fall apart after a couple years (or less).
Humanscale is synonymous with high-end office furniture: The Freedom chair is something of an icon in executive offices across the globe. But Humanscale’s high-end office hardware is at times an awkward fit for a home office, as the M8.1 demonstrates.
The Humanscale M8.1 looks similar to the M2.1, but it’s upgraded to handle monitors between 6 and 28 pounds (almost double the M2.1 in our list above). That’s enough to handle nearly any monitor available today, including large ultrawides like the Dell Ultrasharp U4025QW. The arm can also handle two monitors of the appropriate combined weight and offers a “crossbar” to support them both on a single arm.
That’s good, and useful, but pricing is an obstacle. The arm starts at $545, but the crossbar (required to use two monitors) ups the price to $686. The M/Connect 3 laptop dock is also available to the M8.1 but, of course, adds even more to the price. That’s a bit hard to accept when the Ergotron HX, which supports monitors up to 42 pounds, starts at $350, or $585 for the dual-monitor crossbar version. Ergotron’s alternative feels as sturdy, supports even larger and heavier displays, and is less expensive.
The Humanscale M8.1 has features you won’t find on the Ergotron, such as an optional laptop dock and customizable arm rotation, and it’s a fine selection if price is no obstacle. In most cases, though, the M8.1’s price will be hard to justify.
Huanuo’s HNDS6 is a budget dual-monitor arm that’s popular on Amazon (in fact, it’s listed as the best-seller in Computer Monitor Arms). It provides a reasonable level of quality at a low price but fails to unseat the Workspace by Monoprice Dual Monitor Arm on our list.
We’ll begin with the positives, which, to be clear, outweigh the problems. The Huanuo HNDS6 carefully walks the value tightrope to deliver a decent dual-monitor arm at a typical price of $60 (which can dip below $50 on sale). The arm’s metal construction feels rigid and looks durable.
Each arm is rated to hold between 4.4 and 14.3 pounds. That’s not a lot: The Workstream by Monoprice arm is rated up to 20 pounds. Still, it’s enough to handle a huge majority of 24- and 27-inch monitors, and the monitor arms provided plenty of lift in our testing.
We’re not a fan of the arm’s installation. It has two clamps instead of one unified clamp, which is strange, because the base of the monitor arm is one solid piece. There are roughly a dozen screws to install. And the included cable routing can prove hard to tighten once several cables are held within the routing.
The Huanuo HNDS6 is a decent dual-monitor arm for the price and worthwhile on a discount (it was once sold for just $38). In general, though, we think the Monoprice Workstream Dual Monitor Arm provides more for a similar price.
What to look for in a monitor arm
Purchasing a monitor arm is a bit different from purchasing most home office gear. A monitor arm, unlike a monitor, is a hefty, durable piece of equipment that never really goes obsolete. It must also support the specific functions you want out of the box, since upgrades and customization tend to be limited.
If you’re still on the fence about whether a monitor arm is worth the money and the time it takes to set up, read our article that answers why a monitor arm is most definitely worth it.
Adjustability and range of motion
The range of adjustability and motion a monitor arm can offer is a critical but often overlooked feature. A monitor arm should adjust for height, tilt, swivel, and pivot—and it should do so without tools.
All the monitor arms we recommend meet this standard, but some differences remain. Only some monitor arms provide 360 degrees of swivel, meaning the neck of the monitor arm can be rotated to any position. That’s handy if your desk is in the middle of your room since you can use the monitor from various positions.
Most inexpensive monitor arms ditch adjustability and stick with simple tension mechanisms that are secured by a screw. It’s inexpensive but fixes the monitor’s position in place once it’s adjusted. We recommend avoiding mounts that use this strategy.
Ease of installation and adjustment
None of the monitor arms tested were difficult to install, but the difference between budget and premium models was clear. Budget models require more screws to install, and the default tension of the arm’s adjustment mechanism is less likely to be suitable out-of-the-box.
The ease of adjustment varies greatly, too. All the monitor arms we surveyed require an Allen wrench to adjust tension (which is necessary if the arm seems too stiff or loose), but some were much more difficult than others. The Herman Miller Flo felt smooth and effortless, while the Workstream by Monoprice required serious torque.
Cable management
Proper cable management is important if you value a clean, clutter-free desk.
This is one aspect of design that didn’t improve with pricing. The Herman Miller Flo’s cable management was basic, while the Workstream by Monoprice hid cables well. This did come with a trade-off, though, as the Flo’s seemed least likely to cause cables to bind while moving the monitor.
While cable management is useful, none of the monitor arms I tested can handle the full complement of cables that might be attached to a high-end USB-C monitor (like the Dell U3223QE). This is an aspect of monitor arm design that manufacturers could improve.
Maximum supported size and weight
It’s important to buy a monitor arm that can handle the monitor you own.
This won’t be a major concern if you own a 24-inch or 27-inch monitor, as most such monitors weigh 10 pounds or less. With that said, it’s wise to double-check the monitor’s weight before buying a monitor arm. Remember the monitor’s weight can exclude its stand. Larger 32-inch, 34-inch, and 49-inch monitors are more difficult to handle and may require an upgrade to a “heavy duty” monitor arm.
Monitor size limits should be respected as well. It might be possible to attach a 40-inch monitor to an arm meant for a 32-inch monitor. The 40-inch monitor may even come within the arm’s weight limit. A larger monitor will distribute weight differently, however, which could cause an arm’s tension mechanism to fail.
How we test monitor arms
Every monitor arm we recommend was personally tested first-hand at a PC World contributor’s home or the PC World office. We examine the quality, ease of installation, and range of adjustment of each arm to verify it meets the manufacturer’s claims. The monitors we use to test arms can vary over time, but generally include at least one 27-inch and one 32-inch widescreen monitor. Monitor arms rated for “heavy duty” use were tested with at least one monitor that weighs 20 pounds or more.
FAQ
1.
What is the best monitor arm?
The best single monitor arm is the Ergotron LX Pro. It’s easy to set up, looks attractive, works well in day-to-day use, and, at just a little over $200, remains affordable.
2.
What is the best cheap monitor arm?
The best budget monitor arm is the MSI MAG MT201. It can accommodate screens up to 49 inches and 44 pounds. There is a little bit of assembly required, but the necessary tools are supplied. But once done, adjusting the arm is easy. It also looks very nice for a budget monitor arm. MSRP is $99.99, but it’s common to see the MT201 for $70 or less.
3.
Is a monitor arm worth it?
Whether a monitor arm is worth the price is subjective, but we believe our recommended monitor arms are worth making the investment. A monitor arm is easier to use than a stand, allows a wider range of adjustment, and keeps your desk clear of clutter. They’re also durable—there’s a good chance you’ll replace a monitor before the monitor arm.
4.
Are monitor arms compatible with my monitor?
Nearly all monitors, and nearly all monitor arms, use the VESA mounting standard. The 100x100mm bolt pattern is by far the most common, though 75x75mm is sometimes used as an alternative. All the monitor arms we recommend support both bolt patterns.
Not sure that your monitor supports VESA? Check the rear of the monitor. The VESA mount can be found in the center of the monitor, and the bolt pattern can be verified with a ruler or tape measure. This is likely beneath the neck of your monitor’s stand if you have one attached.
It’s possible to mount a monitor that lacks a VESA mount, but you’ll need to purchase a VESA adapter. It’s a large, X-shaped device that clamps to the rear of the monitor.
5.
Are monitor arms compatible with my desk?
Most monitor arms offer two mounting options: clamp and gromet.
A clamp mount is the most common for home office use. A U-shaped clamp fits over an edge of your desk. A screw mechanism is used to secure it. Most clamps are adjusted by hand and fit a wide range of desks. It’s important to double-check a monitor arm’s specifications if your desk is more than an inch thick, as some clamp mounts are too small to work with a thick desk surface. The clamp also requires an edge that’s free of obstructions on both the top and bottom of the desk.
Grommet mounts insert into the circular cut-outs found on many desks built and sold for corporate offices. A grommet mount is also a form of clamp, but size of the mechanism is different, and the mount attaches the monitor to the interior of the desk instead of an exterior edge.
Nearly all monitor arms ship with a clamp and grommet mount, but grommet mounts are less common. It’s wise to double-check that a grommet mount is supported if that’s how you plan to mount the monitor arm.
6.
Will a monitor arm damage my desk?
It’s possible that a monitor arm’s clamp mount, if used, will cause minor damage to your desk. It may scratch the desk’s surface when mounted or removed, and over-torquing the clamp might cause a dent on some softer desks, such as those which use a veneer over particleboard. A glass desk can also prove troublesome—refer to the desk’s manufacturer to make sure it’s safe to use a monitor arm.
7.
Do monitor arms wobble?
A quality monitor arm will tame minimal monitor wobble, though some might come through if the arm is mounted to a thin, light desk. Make sure to mount the monitor arm to a secure surface and adjust the arm’s tension to a level suitable for the monitor you’ve mounted.
8.
Should I buy a $25 monitor arm on Amazon?
A monitor arm’s price tag can intimidate budget shoppers. Most budget monitors sell for $200 or less. Spending another $150 to $300 for a monitor arm can seem hard to justify.
Still, we encourage shoppers to avoid cheap monitor arms found on Amazon and other retailers. The least expensive monitor arms lack a dynamic tension mechanism, like a gas piston or spring. A few arms in the $35 to $50 range use a gas piston, but it’s often a wimpy example barely sufficient for holding a 27-inch monitor.
Inexpensive monitor arms also lean more heavily on plastic. That’s not necessarily a problem out-of-the-box, but plastic tends to become brittle over time, which may reduce the lifespan of a monitor arm.
last day of REI’s Holiday Sale. For the past 10 years REI has shut its doors for Black Friday, suggesting that instead potential customers should get outside and enjoy the world around you. That’s great advice, but of course Black Friday is also one of the biggest retail spending days of the year, and REI is a for-profit co-op—what to do? Have your holiday sale early, of course.
We’re entering the final weekend of REI’s holiday sale. This year the REI Holiday Sale runs from November 14 to 24. There are two member-exclusive coupons with the Holiday Sale. The first is for 20 percent off a regular-priced item at REI, the second is 20 percent off any item at REI Outlet. Use the code HOLIDAY2025. Many of the best REI deals this year are on the company’s house-brand gear, but we’ve also pulled in deals from competing sales at Backcountry, Six Moon Designs, Zenbivy, and other cottage industry retailers. Below are the best deals on all our favorite tents, backpacks, sleeping bags, pads, cookware, outdoor apparel, and more.
The Flash 22 is possibly the best-value daypack on the market, especially now, on sale. This is a very lightweight, minimalist pack, but it’s surprisingly comfortable. It’ll handle loads up to 15 pounds without straining your shoulders, and the side stash pockets are large enough for a Nalgene bottle or rain jacket. The Flash 22 is made of 70-denier recycled ripstop nylon, which is on the lighter side, but mine has held up well, even on some rough cross-country hikes in the North woods.
The ultralight cousin to the Flash 22, the Flash 18 lacks the hip belt, side stash pockets, and floating lid. The result is a stripped-down, bare-bones pack that we like because you can stuff it in your carry-on and have a nice backpack whenever you need it. Don’t load it up with more than 8 pounds of gear, and avoid anything with pointy bits, as there’s no padding here, but so long as you recognize its limitations, this is a great little pack.
This no-nonsense day pack is comfortable with loads up to about 10 pounds, and has plenty of pockets for organizing your gear. The ripstop nylon body fabric is DWR coated, and the back is better padded and stiffer than the Flash packs above, making it overall a bit more substantial. The U-shape access panel is nearly identical to Mystery Ranch’s Ripruck series, with two zipper sliders to give you quick access to the main compartment. There’s also a zip pocket just under the top to give you a place to stash keys and small items. The side pockets are big enough for a Nalgene bottle and the daisy chains on the bag give you somewhere to clip extra stuff if you need to.
This travel backpack from Six Moon Designs makes it so you no longer have to pick between optimizing for air travel or carrying long distances at your destination. It’s the only bag I’ve used that maximizes your allotted carry-on space while remaining comfortable for a walk across a mid-sized European city or even a day on the trail. The bag’s square shape and suitcase handle make it easy to show the flight crew you’re compliant, but once you deplane, you have adjustable shoulder straps built by a brand that makes gear for serious backpackers. There’s also a padded harness with water bottle holders and a zipper pouches for Clif Bars or a flashlight. —Martin Cizmar
If I were going to live out of a single bag—traveling the world for the rest of my life—this is the bag I would bring. The GR2 is a gear-hauling monster with a ton of built-in organization options. This deal is on the 40L version, which I think is the perfect size for #onebag travel. It still manages to qualify as a carry-on bag for US flights (you may have trouble with that overseas though). The 34L waxed canvas version is also on sale for $340 ($115 off). And yes, it can double as a rucker, though there are better options if that’s your main use case. See below.
This deal is only on a couple of colors, and only the X-Pac fabric, but this is the cheapest we’ve seen the GR1 go for in quite some time. The GoRuck GR1 (7/10, WIRED Review) is the pack that launched the company, and it’s still the best and most versatile of the GoRuck lineup. This deal is on the smaller 21L pack, which I think is the perfect size for rucking, everyday carry, and weekend trips. I have lived out of the 21L bag (with a shoulder bag for my camera gear) during a weeklong trip. It was a squeeze, but it worked. The 21L GR1 is deceptively large and always seems to swallow more gear than I think it can.
If rucking is your thing, this is the GoRuck to get. It’s very close to the GR1 in size, layout, and fabric options, but the Rucker adds more handles, one on each side. The handles are so that the Rucker can be used as a weight (or kettlebell) in workouts. The interior has a Ruck Plate pocket for holding weight (the 20L version can handle up to 3-pound plates while the 25L can do up to 45-pound plates). The interior pockets are the same as the GR1, but instead of zippers, you get Velcro closures.
The best ultralight day hiking pack, the Cima 15 is made of 100D recycled ripstop with a wraparound UHMWPE stretch mesh that forms the two side pockets and back pocket. The straps are quite cushy and comfortable, better than most straps you’ll find on small capacity packs. You might think 15L won’t hold everything you need, but it does. I manage to cram the essentials plus my camera gear, binoculars, and more in it and it stays comfortable. There’s an internal sleeve for a water bladder that happens to fit a 13-inch laptop if you want to use it to commute to work.
Gossamer Gear makes some of our favorite packing cubes for travel and backpacking. They’re light and spacious and the dual-chamber dirty/clean cube linked to here has a “dirty” side that seals up tight and keeps everything tidy. The clear cube $15 ($5 off) is also great. It zips and has multiple mesh pockets. It works both as a clear bag for liquids when you’re going through airport security, or a tech pouch for chargers and other sundries when you’re camping.
Oddly enough, for someone who isn’t a big fan of lumbar packs, this is probably my most-used bag. It’s our top pick for all-day adventures thanks to its array of pockets. The Tour is loaded with stash spaces, allowing me to carry my camera, binoculars, snacks, rain jacket, and more. Thanks to the shoulder strap (sold separately, $14) and the ability to tuck away the belt, the Tour can also be used as a shoulder bag. I even modified mine with a couple extra loops to secure it to the handlebars of my bike.
Nemo’s Resolve is a great pack that incorporates a low-waste footprint into the design. It uses solution-dyed fabrics, and eschews straps and buckles in favor of bungees and pull-tabs. This does make adjusting it fussier, but once you’re used to it and have the fit dialed in, it’s not an issue. The Resolve is a comfortable pack. While technically frameless, it feels like it has some structure. and it sits nice and high on your back. At 1 pound, 15 ounces, it’s also pretty light.
My kid started his hiking career in this pack, which carried him from the mountains of Colorado to the hot barren mesas of Chaco Canyon. It’s not cheap (though this deal takes some of the pain away), but it’s well-made, and, most important, stable and comfortable. It’s also the easiest kid-hiking-pack to get on and off, which you will inevitably do, a lot.
Six Moon Design’s Lunar Solo (7/10, WIRED Review) is my favorite single-wall ultralight solo tent. It’s not without its quirks (read the pitching tips), but if you want something more than a tarp, that still weighs just 26 ounces (740 grams), this one is hard to beat. It’s well ventilated for a single-walled tent, with the ability to raise up the front door when weather is nice. I also like that it only needs one trekking pole (or one pole if you don’t hike with trekking poles). You’d be hard-pressed to find a tent even half this nice at this price.
The Big Agnes Copper Spur tents are a perennial favorite around the WIRED office. Well, actually none of us work in an office, but we still love the Copper Spur. The only one on sale at REI this year is this, the monstrous five-person version. I have not tested this model, however I have taken my three kids backpacking in the four-person version and very much wished I had this one. As with most backpacking tents, the Copper Spur’s are more comfortable when you get one more person worth than you need. The miraculous thing about this five-person model is that it somehow only weighs 7 pounds, 5 ounces, which is not bad at all if you’re distributing it among four people. Note that this is an REI Outlet deal, which means members can get an additional 20 percent off with the coupon HOLIDAY2025, bringing the sale price down to $467, which is a crazy good deal for this tent.
Thank you Public Lands for stepping up to put the two-person version of the Copper Spur on sale. It’s currently our top pick for lightweight freestanding backpacking tents, and it’s been a popular choice with readers for years. This is a high-quality, well-designed tent that’s lightweight, easy to set up, and roomy enough to be livable in the backcountry. The “awning” design (with trekking poles or sticks) is a nice extra, and the mix of 15D nylon and 20D ripstop, while it feels fragile, has held up well over time.
Sea to Summit’s “3-plus season” tents are capable enough in almost any weather while staying crazy light—just 3 pounds, 12 ounces for this two-person model. I used the three-person version on a five-day trip to Loon Lake in northern California in early October, a true “shoulder season” trip with daytime highs in the 80s, nighttime lows in the 40s, and overnight winds of up to 60 mph. My favorite design detail is that the pole bag is kept rigid by an insert of opaque white plastic. Clip it to the tent’s ceiling, pop in your headlamp, and illuminate your abode. —Michael Calore
Nemo’s Dagger Osmo line of tents are reasonably light with roomy interiors and have proved very storm-proof in my testing. The three-person version has long been my tent of choice for trips with my kids. Setup is simple thanks to the single main pole design (which forks at each end) with a cross pole in the middle. There are two spacious vestibules for storing gear, and if you leave the rain fly off, the mesh room is excellent for stargazing.
The Nemo Mayfly is a three-season backpacking tent with a trail weight of 3 pounds, 8 ounces for the two-person version I tested. Split between two people, each is carrying under 2 pounds. The Mayfly uses a semi-freestanding design to keep weight down, which does mean you have to stake out the foot end. It’s on the small side as well, at 27.9 square feet of living space, with two 7-square-foot vestibule areas. I find it plenty livable for two, and the cross pole gives you a wider roof area than most tents this size. I love the white mesh (instead of black) and the super simple clips that keep the rain fly secured.
Sea to Summit’s ultralight Alto tent (8/10, WIRED Recommends) is designed to keep weight down on your solo adventures. At just 33 ounces for a semi-freestanding tent, it remains one of the lighter options on the market, and at this price it’s hard to pass up. The mesh netting helps keep weight down, though for something warmer, the Plus version, which has less mesh, is also on sale for $412 ($137 off), an equally outstanding deal.
Goassamer Gear’s The Two is an ultralight, two-person shelter that weighs just about 2 pounds (slightly more if you account for the trekking poles you need to pitch it). Probably my favorite part of this tent in terms of ultralight performance is how small it stuffs down—to about the size of Nalgene water bottle, which means I can shove it in the side pocket of my pack. The seams are factory-taped and the dual doors make it easy to get in and out.
I rarely bring a chair backpacking, but if I did, the Nemo Moonlite Elite would be in my pack. At 18 ounces, it’s one of the lightest chairs around, and it packs down nice and small. It’s comfortable and reasonably stable. Nemo also solved the main problem with all pole chairs; The included base pad keeps it from sinking into soft ground.
The Flexlite Air camp chair is a great example of the promise of REI brand gear: It offers 90 percent of the designer item, for 70 percent of the price. It’s not quite as nice as the Nemo above, but it’s still comfortable (it does wobble a little, side to side when you move) and it’s nearly half the price.
This chair is the coziest way to hang out around camp. It is somewhat huge, heavy, and awkward to fold up and carry, but it’s all worth it once you cram everyone you love on it in front of a fire. The even bigger and more awkward three-person version is also on sale for $108 ($71 off).
I’ve noticed that, when trying to lighten their load with a smaller, lighter backpack, people then struggle to fit all their gear. The answer for sleeping bags and clothing is this compression stuff sack, which smashes anything soft down to about half the size of the same item in a regular stuff sack. This works well with sleeping bags and clothing, especially puffer jackets, but also fleece and merino wool.
The Petzl Tikka is the best headlamp you can buy. I’ve had the same Petzl Tikka for 14 years, and it’s still going strong. The Tikka is not the brightest, topping out at 450 lumens, but it’s plenty of light to cook by in the backcountry. There are three light modes: bright, brighter, and brightest. There’s also a red light mode to retain some of your night vision. The Tikka runs on three AAA batteries (we recommend Panasonic Eneloop rechargeable batteries) and lasts over 5.5 hours.
I have never slept so well camping as I have on this mat. Technically I have the car-friendly model, but in terms of comfort, they’re the same. In our guide to car camping pads the Therm-a-rest MondoKing edges out the Megamat for top pick among the monster sleeping pads, but I prefer the Megamat for it’s extra warmth (it has an R-value of 8.1 to the MondoKing’s R 7.0) and the soft texture of the top. It’s comfortable enough to sleep directly on the Megamat.
If you want just one pad that’s plush enough for car camping yet reasonably lightweight (2 pounds, 2 ounces for the regular size linked here) and small enough for backpacking, this is the pad to get. That’s why it’s our favorite sleeping pad for car camping. There are lighter pads, there are comfier pads, but the Comfort Plus sets itself apart by being able to gracefully slip between those worlds.
If you’re camping with a buddy and you want to snuggle up at night, this plush two-person sleeping pad is our top pick. The 5R rating means it’s made for cold weather, but even cinched into its included stuff sack, it’s fairly large and heavy, so it’s best for car camping, canoe camping, or any situation where you don’t have to haul it in a pack. (For summer backpacking, consider the lighter three-season 3R version, also on sale.) Each side has its own valve, so both sleepers can use the included inflation bag to pump up the pad to their desired firmness. —Michael Calore
The Yeti Hopper Flip 12 is a nice little personal-size cooler. Hopper Flip 12 closes with a water proof zipper, which has never leaked on me thus far. With 12 quarts of capacity, it’s not huge. Think a six pack and sandwich, depending on what you use to keep things cold (ice packs are the way to go with this one).
My favorite stove for actually cooking real food in the backcountry, the Firebox Nano is a titanium (or steel, but I highly recommend titanium) shell that you can fit with an alcohol burner like the Trangia Spirit burner, or an isobutane burner. You can also use wood to cook directly over flames the way your ancestors did, and you should. For backpacking, with its frequent and pesky burn bans, the Firebox Gas Burner with its diffusion plate is hands down the best backcountry cooking system. It won’t win you any prizes at the next /r/Ultralight get-together (the Firebox Nano on its own weighs 4.25 ounces for the titanium version), but you could be eating some delicious food in the backcountry.
The Stash is our favorite all-in-one backcountry cook system. The heat diffuser design is what speeds up boil times (Jetboil claims 2.5 minutes, which I was only able to match indoor in still air), but the real appeal here to me is the way this kit all packs down into itself. For weekend trips, this is the simplest system I’ve tested when it comes to cooking for two.
Camp Chef’s Explorer 2 is similar to our favorite Camp Chef stove, the Pro 60X. It’s slightly less powerful, but it’s still free-standing, ruggedly built, and cooks extremely hot. It’s a wonderful stove to cook on, and I know more than a few river guides who swear by it. Your giant pot of water for spaghetti noodles will boil in no time, though it’s not great for simmering. If you want to use a griddle, or simmer a sauce, pick up the heat diffuser. It’s overkill in most circumstances, but for large groups, like a scout troop or guided trip, it’s the best choice, hands down.
REI sales are the time to grab this upgrade stove. Sure, the basic version below gets the job done, but the cast iron burners of the Cascade are so much nicer and more durable. The griddle plate is also handy, perfect for cranking out pancakes. My only gripe is that I wish there were an option to get two griddles, as I find the grill not nearly as useful.
Walk around any campground in America and you’ll likely see dozens of these, for good reason. They’re easy to use, last a long time, and aren’t all that expensive. The 10,000-BTU burners are plenty to cook on just about any pan you have (I use cast iron pans on mine), and the electronic ignition means you don’t have to keep track of a lighter.
Our favorite way to avoid those green propane bottles is this propane growler. The Ignik Deluxe is a 1.2-pound propane tank with a nice padded/insulated sleeve and a handy strap for carrying. It makes your camp setup look much nicer than a bare tank. It also saves your shins during those inevitable run-ins with cold hard steel that come from lugging around a big propane tank. This size is the equivalent of five green propane bottles.
I’m not sure this really qualifies for the “ultralight” moniker, and these pots are unfortunately marred by having a ton of fake influencer reviews out there, but they’re actually quite good. The hard-anodized aluminum is sturdy and provides good heat transfer. The ceramic nonstick coating makes for easy cleanup and the 1.3L size is perfect for cooking for two.
I used to make fun of my editor for being irrationally attached to this spoon, but then he said, why don’t you try one. So I did. And now I am also irrationally attached to this bamboo spoon. So is my daughter who keeps trying to steal it from me. Why do I like it some much? I don’t know, it’s just a really nice spoon. Perhaps it’s because I have an equally irrational dislike of long handled titanium spoons (along with the backpacking “food” in pouches which they are designed for). I have an idea, why don’t you just try this spoon for yourself. It’s $4. You spent more than that on coffee this morning.
REI makes some great, reasonably priced commuter bikes. Even better the company will build them in-house and offers a year of free adjustments. This is great deal on our favorite commuter, with a Class 3 motor (pedal assist up to 28 mph) on a step-through frame.
Cannondale’s Adventure Neo line (8/10, WIRED Recommends) has a 250-watt Bafang motor with a Bafang sensor and a thumb throttle, which makes it a class 2 ebike (it tops out at 20 mph assist). It’s not the most powerful bike we’ve tested, but it features reliable components from Shimano and Bosch along with great shocks and a suspension seat post.
We’ve tried several Aventon models and appreciate the high level of quality for a relatively low price point (the accessories are better than Lectric’s, too). This fat-tire ebike (8/10, WIRED Recommends) is affordable, versatile, and has built-in commuter essentials. We also like the Soltera.2 and the Abound, both of which are on sale.
This is still the best budget rain jacket you can buy. REI’s Rainier Jacket is impressively waterproof and reasonably long-lasting for $70. The durable water repellent (DWR) is PFAS-free, but still pretty good. You also get taped seams and an adjustable hood, two nice features you generally don’t find in jackets this cheap.
REI’s Sahara Shade Hoodie offers UPF 50+ fabric (a polyester and spandex blend) to protect you from that high-altitude sun (or any sun). It’s soft and stretchy, so you have a good range of movement, and there are thumbholes in the sleeves to keep them from riding up and exposing your arms. The three-panel hood has a drawstring you can use the cinch it down and keep your neck covered as well. I do prefer merino sun hoodies, but they’re double the price, if not more.
These are my favorite travel pants. I wore these for two weeks traveling to southeast Asia from the United States and for shorter business trips. In the darker black and navy colors, they look more professional and not quite so sporty. The majority cotton blend looks crisp and washes and wears well. The pants still look good after 15 straight hours of flying (and several years) but they still dry quickly after I spilled a full cup of apple juice on my lap (thanks, kids).The drawcord means that it’s easy to adjust the fit, depending on whether you’re airplane bloating or traveler’s diarrhea. Also, there are a ton of pockets and they all either snap or zip closed, which means your phone or earbuds won’t fall out when you’ve fallen asleep while watching Leap Year for the 400th time. They also come in a men’s version.—Adrienne So
Smartwool’s 100 percent merino Classic Thermal base layer is a nice, heavy 250-gsm merino, base layer, making it a great base layer for cold weather. It’s our top pick heavyweight base layer. It fits looser, making it feel more like a comfortable shirt. The looser fit makes it possible to use this as a second base layer over something like Ibex Woolies when it’s extremely cold (this combo is something I wear all the time here in Northern Wisconsin). The bottoms are also on sale (Men’s/Women’s).
Icebreaker’s 200 Oasis base layer is a 200-gsm base layer. This is about what most of us call a mid-weight base layer, making it a good choice for everything from cool weather hiking in the fall or spring, to skiing in the front country. The 100 percent merino fibers here are not quite as soft at the Smartwool above, but they’re equally good at regulating body temperature and wicking away moisture. This is also the fastest drying merino top in our base layers guide.
REI’s base layers are a solid value. If you want one base layer to do it all and don’t want to spend a fortune, these are the base layers to get. You can have a crew top and bottom for less than a single garment of merino or a brand name synthetic. This is the mid-weight version, which is 220 GSM (92 percent recycled polyester, 8 percent spandex). They’re comfortable with a tight, but not overly tight, fit that makes them easy to layer over, and there’s nice extras like thumb loops on the sleeves.
I’m just going to keep singing the praises of this shirt until every WIRED reader has one. Then we can move on. If you live in a cold climate, even if it’s not quite Canada, you need this shirt. It’s your classic, ultra-warm wool shirt. Sorry, shirt jacket. Whatever it is, it’s warm, cozy, and comfy. Don’t let the wool scare you. It’s not itchy.
There are tons of neck gators out there, but this is my favorite (I actually have the slightly longer version, but this is close). Like most things merino it puzzles me how this keeps me warm in the winter, and keeps the sun off my neck in the summer without making me overheat. Somehow it manages this. These make great gifts for your outdoorsy friends too.
These Fjällräven pants are among my favorite hiking pants. The G-1000 fabric is 65 percent recycled polyester and 35 percent organic cotton. They’ve got pockets everywhere and extras like ventilation zippers, reinforced knees (with openings for pads), and a loop on the leg to hold a axe. Do your pants have a axe loop? Didn’t think so. Note that Fjällräven recently changed the fit, so if you’re an old school wearer of these, size up.
The Smartwool Classic merino tee is an honorable mention in our guide to the best merino wool t-shirts. It’s a nice shirt, especially at this price which brings it down below even the cheapest options in that guide. It’s a Nuyarn blend (88 percent merino, 12 percent nylon), with the merino spun around the nylon. Mine has held up incredibly well. I’ve had it for several years and it’s still going strong. It does run on the large side, and has a looser fit, so size accordingly, but this is a great, low price way to fill out your merino t-shirt collection.
I like these socks for everyday wear in addition to the intended use, hiking. They’re a blend: 54 percent merino wool, 37 percent recycled nylon, 6 percent nylon, and 3 percent elastane to give them a bit of stretch. I find they keep my feet nice and dry, wicking better than several other merino socks I have.
Merrell’s Vapor Glove shoes have been a perennial favorite at WIRED, topping our Barefoot Shoes guide for years. They’re quite thin (6mm stack height) and plenty flexible, allowing your feet to bend and shape to the terrain. That said, the Vapor Glove (and the Trail Glove as well) do not have the extra wide footbox you’ll find in some barefoot shoes. I find the ankle and arch fit to be spot on, but I do wish they had a wider toe box so my toes could spread out more.
This is a good deal on Garmin’s most popular satellite messenger, but we always like to add the caveat that not everyone needs one. If you frequently hike alone, or do a lot of high alpine hiking and climbing, it’s probably worth carrying. As with any satellite messenger, you will have to subscribe to a safety plan, in addition to buying the device itself. If you only go on one or two big trips a year, you might want to consider a personal locator beacon (PLB) instead.
The Instinct 3 is our favorite Garmin watch and this deal makes the solar version the same price as the regular. The Instinct line has all the backcountry functionality of the Fenix watches but it’s much cheaper. This latest model includes a built-in flashlight and a metal-reinforced bezel with a scratch-resistant display and built to the durable MIL-STD 810 standard, meaning that’s undergone heavy thermal and shock resistance tests.
GoPro’s Hero 13 Black is our favorite GoPro for recording all your outdoor adventures. It has an interchangeable lens system to offer many more shooting options than other action cameras (in fairness Insta360 just added lenses to its Ace Pro 2, but we haven’t had a chance to try those yet). In addition to the standard wide angle action camera lens you can also invest in an Ultra Wide ($90), Macro ($120), and Anamorphic ($120) lens. All of these are automatically detected by the Hero 13 the minute you attach them. The camera will automatically adjust settings to match the lens and let you get back to what you were doing. It’s lots of fun and video quality is excellent.
These are our all-around favorite 8 x 42 binoculars. With the M5 Nikon has struck a nice balance between optical power, quality, and price. The roof prism design includes phase coatings and ED glass (Extra Low Dispersion Glass). The multi-coated glass cuts down on chromatic aberrations (distortion or color fringing sometimes seen around objects in bright sunlight), and the Monarch M5s give nice, bright views with very little distortion, making them excellent birding binoculars. The eyepieces have large (21 mm) eye lenses and they’re deeply recessed in the eye cups, which allows for nearly a full field of view even when wearing glasses. They’re also light enough that they can hang around your neck all day without bothering you too much.
REI’s Magma 15 is one of our top sleeping bags. It’s warm (comfort rated to 21 degrees Fahrenheit) with a 15-denier nylon ripstop nylon shell (Bluesign approved, with a non-fluorinated DWR coating to keep moisture at bay). Baffles are variably spaced and not stitched through, which helps the fill stay put and minimizes cold spots. I also really like the Magma hood, which is warm and stays on your head throughout the night. There’s a nice interior stash pocket I use to keep my headlamp handy.
Nemo’s Forte 20 is a 30-degree (comfort rated) synthetic-fill sleeping bag, making it a good choice for summer. It’s our favorite synthetic bag. What I like most about this bag, and nearly all of Nemo’s sleeping bags, is the wider cut through the torso area down to the knees. This bag is almost a hybrid of a mummy bag and your father’s good old 1970s square sleeping bag. Which is to say, this bag is roomy.
We’re still working on a guide to backpacking quilts, but it will probably surprise no one to learn that this is our current pick for best value quilt. Like the Magma 30 sleeping bag, the Magma quilt is not the lightest, nor the warmest, but you get a lot, for not a lot. The 15-denier shell encloses 850-fill-power water-resistant goose down that’s comfort-rated down to 30 F. Weighing just 1 lb. 6 oz for a long, the Magma is on the light side for the temp rating. The foot box uses a zipper and drawstring system to be either completely open and flat, or zipped up and cinched down like a sleeping bag on cooler nights.
Zenbivy is having a site-wide sale on some of our favorite backcountry sleeping bags. I’ve highlighted the Light Bed because it’s my favorite Zenbivy. If you haven’t tried sleeping on a Zenbivy, you’re in for a treat. This is not your typical sleeping bag, not even your typical quilt system. Zenbivy’s bed is combination of a quilt (I prefer the convertible quilt, which comes completely apart, but there’s also a version with a footbox if you prefer) and a sheet. The two parts clip together to prevent drafts and give you the feeling of sleeping at home in your bed, or at least as close to that as you’re likely to get in a tent. Note that to get the deal you’ll need to sign up for the mailing list to get a code.
Sometimes in winter I look wistfully at this sleeping bag hanging in its storage sack and think, why don’t I live somewhere it’s always summer? There are lighter sleeping bags out there, but the price is hard to beat here. You get 650-fill-power down, plenty for warm summer trips and it still packs down pretty small. The dual side zippers mean you can get more a quilt-like feel when it’s warm rather than feeling trapped in a mummy bag. Note that this is an REI Outlet item so member can take another 20 percent off the price above.
Closed-cell-foam pads like the Therm-a-Rest Z-Lite Sol are a must-have. They weigh next to nothing (10 ounces for the small), fold up small enough to lash to the outside of any pack, and double as a chair, extra padding on cold nights, table, you name it. I am too old and too soft to be the sort of ultra-minimalist who gets by with just a Z-Lite, but I still have one around on almost every trip I take.
Our favorite sleeping bag for summer car camping, the Siesta isn’t fancy, but hey, it’s car camping. If all else fails, there’s a car to retreat to. With that in mind, don’t spend a fortune on a car camping bag if that’s all you need. The Siesta gives you a nice, roomy, rectangular cut, and the 20-degree rating makes it enough for three-season trips. The bonus here is the hood, which you don’t often find in this type of bag. If you don’t need the hood, REI also has the new Campwell 30 degree bag on sale for $70 ($30 off).
Think of a Rumpl blanket as if your sleeping bag had a baby with the coziest lap blanket that your grandma knitted for you. They’re made from DWR-treated ripstop polyester, so they’re sturdy, durable, and resist getting soaked or stained. But they’re also soft and warm enough to fall asleep under on the couch, and they come in a wide variety of colors and patterns (unfortunately only a couple patterns are on sale right now). —Adrienne So
Puffer Jacket and Winter Gear Deals
It’s already snowed once where I live. Now’s the time to score some new ski gear—jackets, helmets, gloves, and googles are all on sale.
With an 850-fill-power goose down and a recycled ripstop nylon shell, this is one of the warmer jackets in our best puffer jackets guide. I like the zippered chest pocket (there are also two zippered hand pockets, one of which the jacket stuffs into), and at 12.5 ounces this jacket is surprisingly light for how warm it is. The front zip has a wind flap, and there’s even a draft collar, something you hardly ever find in a puffer at this price. Even better, you can cinch the hood to keep cold air from blowing in the sides.
Our favorite bargain three-season puffer jacket, the REI 650 down jacket isn’t as warm as the Magma above, but it’s hard to argue with this price. If you need a cheap, packable jacket for those cold summits or stargazing on chilly nights, this is the jacket to get. The stitched-through baffles mean this one isn’t as warm and is more susceptible to wind, but at this price, it’s worth buying.
Initially I did not like the idea of a down vest. If it’s cold enough to need a down jacket, my arms are probably cold too right? But then I moved somewhere cold (Why? I don’t know, but I did) and realized there is an infinite variety of shades when it comes to cold. For some shades of cold, the vest is the right move. Pair it with a good base layer, maybe even a hoodie, and you have something that’s warm, but leaves your arms free to swing an ax or whatever you might be doing.
Fjällräven’s hybrid fill jacket uses 700-fill-power down for most of the jacket but adds recycled polyester insulation over the shoulders to help resist moisture. That later works quite well when the snow is really coming down. The hood does a good job of keeping you warm while staying out of your way thanks to two drawcord tabs at the front, and an elastic drawcord at the back. It also, as the name suggests, packs down pretty small.
Mountain Hardwear’s Ghost Whisperer down jacket will be a pick in my next update for the Puffer Jacket Guide. It’s one of the best technical down puffers I’ve tested — thanks to the 800-fill down it’s warm, light, and packs down small. The medium weighs just about 8 ounces on my scale, though it does seem to run a bit small, I had to size up to large, the medium was a bit tight. Unfortunately the men’s version is pretty much sold out, though there are a couple size/color combos left. The jacket version, without the hood, is also on sale.
Sure it’s odd to be buying a paddleboard in November, when there’s possibly snow on the ground (there is at my house), but a deal is a deal, and this is a good deal on one of our favorite Bote paddleboards. This large, stable SUP is great for beginners, it tracks well and despite the stability it’s surprisingly nimble and easy to steer. If you go all-in on the accessories you can end up with a two-in-one kayak/SUP hybrid, which makes it more versatile.
The Isle Switch 3 is by far my favorite inflatable that I have tested. Do you want to paddle out in glassy, still water and lie on your belly with your dog and watch fish? Then it’s a big, solid, stable paddleboard with a grippy, soft surface perfect for puppy paws. Is there a bit of a breeze and you want to put the full force of your paddling muscles in play? Slip the hooks into the eyes and tighten the straps to put on a big, comfy seat and foot brace. (I used mine as a seat for the kids behind me.) Even the paddle converts from an SUP paddle to a kayak paddle. I can’t believe I’ve never tried one of these before. This deal includes a free electric pump. —Adrienne So
The Breeze Aero inflatable paddleboard (7/10, WIRED Recommends) is well-built and durable, and it packs up reasonably small. It’s also one of the stablest paddleboards I’ve tried, making it a good choice for beginners. It’s easy to unpack and easy to use. Inflating is something of a chore with the hand pump, but once it’s deflated, it’s not hard to stow it away. This deal is on the 11’6″ model (which supports up to 355 pounds).
I have never actually tried one of Oru’s folding kayaks, but my editor and fellow gear tester Adrienne So loves them. The Inlet is one of Oru’s beginner models, but with room to grow as you you get more comfortable with it. It’s light and fast, and folds origami-style into a box that’s 42″ x 10″ x 18″, a bit like an oversized briefcase and still plenty small enough to fit a couple in your trunk. It weighs just 20 pounds and can hold one person up to 6’2″, 275 pounds.
The age-old problem of 3D printing at home is simple: What do you actually print? Even if you have the best 3D printer imaginable, without something cool to print, it’s just a paperweight. Finding those projects that make a 3D printer worthwhile is the continued bane of every 3D printer user. A new company is looking to make this struggle a little easier with something called Print Kits.
I’ve had a chance to play with several of the Print Kits, and so far, I like what I see. Print Kits are a subscription. For $38 per month,or $50 if you’d like to include a selection of fun filaments to try, Print Kits will send you a complete package with everything you need, except the tools. And I do mean everything. If the kit requires batteries, the company includes them, which is rare for this type of gift box.
I know that Black Friday sales are in full swing and that everyone is looking for the perfect gift for their family. There are plenty of accessories for the person in your life who loves to 3D print, but a subscription to Print Kits will give them something to do every month. It’s also worth buying the three-, six-, or 12-month options as well. The more you buy, the cheaper the boxes get.
Space is the right environment for a TV with this level of staggering contrast, and it’s not just the dramatic moments, but also the more subtly lit scenes that stand out. Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 2 is full of searing highlights and colorful bursts of space glow, but moments like the crisp sunrise on the Guardians’ plumb-brown shirts or the dark corridors of their small ship were just as impressive thanks to the Z95B’s masterful color gradients and shadow detail.
That meticulous touch comes through in everything you watch, including plain old HD sitcoms like The Office, where I found myself oddly enamored with moments like the auburn highlights of Jim’s hair or the gleam of Andy’s tie. This may not be the reason you buy a premium TV, but it’s lovely to find joy in the little things. Skin tones look almost touchably natural and clean, enhanced by the TV’s knockout image processing, and even lower-quality video looks good with its improved upscaling.
That’s not to say you won’t find plenty of bombast here; the Z95B gets as bright as anyone should need when properly tasked. Playing Mad Max: Fury Road on 4K HDR Blu-ray with the Panasonic DP-UB9000 elicited the perfect dichotomy between the dull desert backdrop and the catastrophic lightning storm. The storm’s jagged bolts split the sky with precision, erupting with blistering shocks of orange and white, right down to that sputtering white-hot flare.
Part of the Z95B’s potency comes from its excellent glare reduction. Like the LG G5, it’s able to reduce everything but direct reflections while preserving its obsidian backdrop for a more dramatic contrast in brighter rooms than Sony’s rival Bravia 8 II QD-OLED. I think the Bravia beats both TVs for image clarity, but it’s close. Only Samsung’s similar S95F offers a more potent way to kill the glare while still preserving contrast.
The Z95B and G5 are unsurprisingly similar, given that they share the same panel. The Z95B feels slightly more natural in its color and lighting, and a bit better for off-axis viewing, but that may be recency bias. I’d need to see them back-to-back to point to any real differences. Some extra color banding in Dolby Vision streaming content and a bit of image stuttering are the only noticeable flaws I saw in the Z95B over two weeks. (Note: I reviewed the G5 after LG addressed initial complaints of HDR color banding.)
All four premium OLEDs provide knockout performance, each with its own specialty. I’m partial to the G5 and Z95B over the Samsung and Sony for their balance of fiery brightness with jet-black backdrops—and the G5 has an edge with its four HDMI 2.1 ports and better smarts. The Z95B is hard to deny, though. If you’re after an all-in-one screen that elevates everything to showcase levels, this is the TV to take home.
After three seasons with a face-of-the-franchise-type superstar to headline the winter, there is no Aaron Judge, Shohei Ohtani or Juan Soto in the 2025-26 free agent class. But there is still one player whose potential availability could rock the offseason ahead: Tarik Skubal.
Why would the Detroit Tigers possibly move their ace on the heels of his second straight American League Cy Young Award and the team’s second consecutive postseason appearance?
Quite simply, because keeping Skubal in Detroit is going to become very expensive, very soon. The 28-year-old left-hander will enter the final year of his contract in 2026 before he is scheduled to reach free agency after the season. If he does hit the market next winter, Skubal has a chance of surpassing Los Angeles Dodgers ace Yoshinobu Yamamoto’s record $325 million contract, and he could even become baseball’s first $400 million pitcher.
With Tigers president of baseball operations Scott Harris facing a decision that will shape the future of the franchise — and impact all of MLB — we talked with 11 industry insiders about what Detroit should do this offseason, broken into three main options.
This was the least-popular option among our panel and one rival executive explained why.
“The whole reason you do all this is to start a season with a potential contender that has an ace. You can’t throw that away before the season starts. How long will it take to get here again?”
Some panelists hemmed and hawed about how much a team would have to overpay to get Detroit to consider a trade, believing an offer that included a young starting pitcher with front-line potential would be enough to start internal conversations — but nobody could get themselves logically to advocate for a deal unless something completely illogical was offered. And that type of deal increasingly doesn’t happen in modern baseball.
If the Tigers were to trade Skubal for anything less than a gobsmacking return, it would likely mean their competitive window would be tighter — and it would be hard to call Detroit a contender without Skubal next season. Dealing away a player of his caliber would label the Tigers a small-market team, at least by mindset, and bring into question whether they would find themselves in this situation again as other star players approach free agency. It’s much easier to push some, but not all, of their chips to the middle for the upcoming season and see what they can do with Skubal leading the way. Who knows when the next opportunity will come?
When I asked these sources what the Tigers should do, they seemed unsure about how Detroit was viewing the situation but leaned toward believing the Tigers would keep Skubal going into next season. That said, knowing what the market will bear is what Harris likes to do, so the drumbeat of Skubal being available in the right deal — or at least in the sense that Detroit would listen before hanging up — will likely continue.
2. Keep Skubal, but trade him at the deadline if the season doesn’t go as planned
In the event things go sideways during the first half of the 2026 season, everyone on our panel agreed that this was the right move. Defining what “going sideways” means with the expanded playoffs is hard, but battling for a wild-card spot around the trade deadline was where the gray area began for our panelists.
“You cannot, under any circumstances, hold Skubal through the trade deadline and miss the playoffs. That would be a catastrophe,” said one agent.
The haul would still be formidable for a rental deal — back-of-the-envelope math says two prospects ranking later in the top 100 or one elite young player, roughly speaking — but also because the offers would have to clear the bar of Detroit receiving a compensation pick just after the first round to even be considered, as that’s what the Tigers would get if Skubal walked in free agency (under the current free agency system).
Another rival executive has an informed theory on Harris’ focus: “He has his eyes set on 2027 and 2028 as his prime contending years.” If things go well in 2026, the window would expand to include it as well. Top prospects Kevin McGonigle and Max Clark, the No. 2 and No. 6 prospects in the sport, could be core players as soon as the second half of 2026, so aiming for things to really take off in 2027 is logical.
Opinions vary on whether Skubal would fetch more this winter or at the deadline because it’s hard to project how desperate a contender could hypothetically be at the deadline versus what that team would offer to get an entire season of Skubal plus a first-round pick when he walks. It’s safe to assume the return would likely be a bit less at the deadline.
3. Keep Skubal no matter what, try to extend him and take the draft pick if he ends up leaving
This would be a bold move in the era of the asset value-focused approach that so many teams are taking now. If Skubal were to walk in free agency, the compensation would likely be a draft pick in the 30s the following summer — and that’s it. That type of pick is valued at roughly $8-10 million of surplus value, depending on your source.
There is more value that would come before that for Detroit, but it’s hard to quantify. The Tigers would get another title run with the reigning back-to-back AL Cy Young winner and more time to convince him to stay in Detroit. Maybe that combination could make magic and both sides could land on a deal before he hits free agency. Skubal has said he wants to stay in Detroit, so you can’t rule it out. Another rival executive thinks Harris is focused on how to make this happen. “[Harris] will never believe he can’t sign Skubal.”
That being said, Skubal being represented by Scott Boras makes it unlikely he will sign a deal without at least testing the market, as Boras typically advises clients to hit free agency.
There’s one more variable, though, that is unique to the timing of Skubal’s free agency: the expected labor strife next winter, with the current CBA expiring on Dec. 1, 2026. It’s unlikely Boras wants Skubal to be on the market through a labor stoppage that would leave him potentially signing right before spring training after some teams have spent their available cash and with the economic model of the game potentially changing in a way that hurts Skubal’s market. One source said the CBA complication moves the odds that Skubal signs an extension before free agency from 0% to 10%.
The last time there was a labor stoppage hanging over free agency, we saw a frenzy of late-November deals before the Dec. 1 lockout. A similar quicker free agent process that ends with Skubal signing around Thanksgiving would give Detroit a slight leg up, given the familiarity and exclusive negotiating window before free agency, relative to a protracted, winter-long bidding war.
The contract marks to beat are Yamamoto’s $325 million guarantee that is the most ever for pitchers and Max Fried’s $218 million guarantee that is tops among left-handers all-time. Both of those contracts were landed by agencies other than Boras Corp., and setting precedents is a large part of how top agencies market themselves to potential nine-figure clients.
It’s also worth noting Skubal had Tommy John surgery in college and flexor tendon surgery in 2022, which are factors to consider when projecting a long-term deal in free agency.
Are Harris and the Tigers likely to win a straight bidding war with a precedent-setting guarantee? No, but if they can offer a shorter deal at an AAV record with opt-outs, they would at least have a path, albeit a narrow one, to keeping their ace.
The real issue for Detroit is their payroll. They finished last season with a $155 million competitive balance tax (CBT) payroll figure, over $90 million below the first CBT tax threshold. If Skubal will be getting an AAV in the $30 millions or even the low $40 millions, can the Tigers really justify giving a quarter of their payroll to one player? Would Harris do that, or would signing Skubal be part of a larger move to a payroll number that can justify fitting Skubal in there as the Tigers see their peak competitive window opening? If McGonigle and Clark show up late in 2026 and look like future stars, that won’t bump the payroll, but it could make the Tigers look more competitive going forward and that could help their long-term case to Skubal, as well.
This logic — if things go well in 2026, the Tigers will contend and hold onto Skubal through the season — is also why another executive mused on Detroit’s options if it traded Skubal at the deadline. “You could still trade [Skubal] and then sign him back long-term, but I can’t imagine the series of events where that would actually happen.”
There’s also the reading of the tea leaves for this winter. Some sources mentioned Detroit is targeting pitching depth early in free agency. Is that to backfill for a potential Skubal trade? A deal now or at the deadline? Or just to create depth for a title run like all contending teams need? Or to create leverage/depth so they have maximum optionality for all of 2026? You can see what you want to see when it comes to the Rorschach test that is the team-building conundrum of the winter.
Zelenskyy says ‘we must do everything’ against ‘wicked Russian attacks’ as Ukraine and US meet for emergency talks
The Ukrainian delegation has held talks with European security officials in Geneva, according to the head of Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s office, Andriy Yermak.
“Overall, a series of meetings in various formats is planned for today. We continue working together to achieve a lasting and just peace for Ukraine,” Yermak wrote in a post on X. “The next meeting is with the US delegation. We are in a very constructive mood.”
Imagine a town with two widget merchants. Customers prefer cheaper widgets, so the merchants must compete to set the lowest price. Unhappy with their meager profits, they meet one night in a smoke-filled tavern to discuss a secret plan: If they raise prices together instead of competing, they can both make more money. But that kind of intentional price-fixing, called collusion, has long been illegal. The widget merchants decide not to risk it, and everyone else gets to enjoy cheap widgets.
For well over a century, US law has followed this basic template: Ban those backroom deals, and fair prices should be maintained. These days, it’s not so simple. Across broad swaths of the economy, sellers increasingly rely on computer programs called learning algorithms, which repeatedly adjust prices in response to new data about the state of the market. These are often much simpler than the “deep learning” algorithms that power modern artificial intelligence, but they can still be prone to unexpected behavior.
So how can regulators ensure that algorithms set fair prices? Their traditional approach won’t work, as it relies on finding explicit collusion. “The algorithms definitely are not having drinks with each other,” said Aaron Roth, a computer scientist at the University of Pennsylvania.
Yet a widely cited 2019 paper showed that algorithms could learn to collude tacitly, even when they weren’t programmed to do so. A team of researchers pitted two copies of a simple learning algorithm against each other in a simulated market, then let them explore different strategies for increasing their profits. Over time, each algorithm learned through trial and error to retaliate when the other cut prices—dropping its own price by some huge, disproportionate amount. The end result was high prices, backed up by mutual threat of a price war.
Aaron Roth suspects that the pitfalls of algorithmic pricing may not have a simple solution. “The message of our paper is it’s hard to figure out what to rule out,” he said.
Photograph: Courtesy of Aaron Roth
Implicit threats like this also underpin many cases of human collusion. So if you want to guarantee fair prices, why not just require sellers to use algorithms that are inherently incapable of expressing threats?
In a recent paper, Roth and four other computer scientists showed why this may not be enough. They proved that even seemingly benign algorithms that optimize for their own profit can sometimes yield bad outcomes for buyers. “You can still get high prices in ways that kind of look reasonable from the outside,” said Natalie Collina, a graduate student working with Roth who co-authored the new study.
Researchers don’t all agree on the implications of the finding—a lot hinges on how you define “reasonable.” But it reveals how subtle the questions around algorithmic pricing can get, and how hard it may be to regulate.
“Without some notion of a threat or an agreement, it’s very hard for a regulator to come in and say, ‘These prices feel wrong,’” said Mallesh Pai, an economist at Rice University. “That’s one reason why I think this paper is important.”
The recent paper studies algorithmic pricing through the lens of game theory, an interdisciplinary field at the border of economics and computer science that analyzes the mathematics of strategic competitions. It’s one way to explore the failures of pricing algorithms in a controlled setting.
“What we’re trying to do is create collusion in the lab,” said Joseph Harrington, a University of Pennsylvania economist who wrote an influential review paper on regulating algorithmic collusion and was not involved in the new research. “Once we do so, we want to figure out how to destroy collusion.”
Natalie Collina and her colleagues discovered that high prices can arise in unexpected ways.
Photograph: Nandan Tumu
To understand the key ideas, it helps to start with the simple game of rock-paper-scissors. A learning algorithm, in this context, can be any strategy that a player uses to choose a move in each round based on data from previous rounds. Players might try out different strategies over the course of the game. But if they’re playing well, they’ll ultimately converge to a state that game theorists call equilibrium. In equilibrium, each player’s strategy is the best possible response to the other’s strategy, so neither player has an incentive to change.
In rock-paper-scissors, the ideal strategy is simple: You should play a random move each round, choosing all three possibilities equally often. Learning algorithms shine if one player takes a different approach. In that case, choosing moves based on previous rounds can help the other player win more often than if they just played randomly.
Suppose, for instance, that after many rounds you realize that your opponent, a geologist, chose rock more than 50 percent of the time. If you’d played paper every round, you would have won more often. Game theorists refer to this painful realization as regret.
Researchers have devised simple learning algorithms that are always guaranteed to leave you with zero regret. Slightly more sophisticated learning algorithms called “no-swap-regret” algorithms also guarantee that whatever your opponent did, you couldn’t have done better by swapping all instances of any move with any other move (say, by playing paper every time you actually played scissors). In 2000, game theorists proved that if you pit two no-swap-regret algorithms against each other in any game, they’ll end up in a specific kind of equilibrium—one that would be the optimal equilibrium if they only played a single round. That’s an attractive property, because single-round games are much simpler than multi-round ones. In particular, threats don’t work because players can’t follow through.
In a 2024 paper, Jason Hartline, a computer scientist at Northwestern University, and two graduate students translated the classic results from the 2000 paper to a model of a competitive market, where players can set new prices every round. In that context, the results implied that dueling no-swap-regret algorithms would always end up with competitive prices when they reached equilibrium. Collusion was impossible.
However, no-swap-regret algorithms aren’t the only pricing game strategies in the world of online marketplaces. So what happens when a no-swap-regret algorithm faces a different benign-looking opponent?
The Price Is Wrong
According to game theorists, the best strategy to play against a no-swap-regret algorithm is simple: Start with a specific probability for each possible move, and then choose one move at random every round, no matter what your opponent does. The ideal assignment of probabilities for this “nonresponsive” approach depends on the specific game you’re playing.
In the summer of 2024, Collina and her colleague Eshwar Arunachaleswaran set out to find those optimal probabilities for a two-player pricing game. They found that the best strategy assigned strikingly high probabilities to very high prices, along with lower probabilities for a wide range of lower prices. If you’re playing against a no-swap-regret algorithm, this strange strategy will maximize your profit. “To me, it was a complete surprise,” Arunachaleswaran said.
Eshwar Arunachaleswaran and Collina obtained their result while exploring the best responses to well-behaved pricing algorithms.
Photograph: Paritosh Verma
Nonresponsive strategies look superficially innocuous. They can’t convey threats, because they don’t react to their opponents’ moves at all. But they can coax learning algorithms to raise their prices, and then reap profits by occasionally undercutting their competitors.
At first, Collina and Arunachaleswaran thought that this artificial scenario wasn’t relevant to the real world. Surely the player using the no-swap-regret algorithm would switch to a different algorithm after realizing that their competitor was profiting at their expense.
But as they studied the problem further and discussed it with Roth and two other colleagues, they realized their intuition was wrong. The two players in their scenario were already in a state of equilibrium. Their profits were nearly equal, and both were as high as possible as long as neither player switched to a different algorithm. Neither player would have an incentive to change strategy, so buyers would be stuck with high prices. What’s more, the precise probabilities weren’t that important. Many different choices led to high prices when pitted against a no-swap-regret algorithm. It’s an outcome you’d expect from collusion, but without any collusive behavior in sight.
It Pays to Be Dumb
So, what can regulators do? Roth admits he doesn’t have an answer. It wouldn’t make sense to ban no-swap-regret algorithms: If everyone uses one, prices will fall. But a simple nonresponsive strategy might be a natural choice for a seller on an online marketplace like Amazon, even if it carries the risk of regret.
“One way to have regret is just to be kind of dumb,” Roth said. “Historically, that hasn’t been illegal.”
As Hartline sees it, the problem of algorithmic collusion has a simple solution: Ban all pricing algorithms except the no-swap-regret algorithms that game theorists have long favored. There may be practical ways to do this: In their 2024 work, Hartline and his colleagues devised a method for checking if an algorithm has a no-swap-regret property without looking at its code.
Hartline acknowledged that his preferred solution wouldn’t prevent all bad outcomes when no-swap-regret algorithms compete with humans. But he argued that scenarios like the one in Roth’s paper aren’t cases of algorithmic collusion.
“Collusion is a two-way thing,” he said. “It fundamentally must be the case that there are actions a single player can do to not collude.”
Either way, the new work still leaves many open questions about how algorithmic pricing can go wrong in the real world.
“We still don’t understand nearly as much as we want,” Pai said. “It’s an important question for our time.”
Original storyreprinted with permission fromQuanta Magazine, an editorially independent publication of theSimons Foundationwhose mission is to enhance public understanding of science by covering research developments and trends in mathematics and the physical and life sciences.
C. Next.js 16 Route Handler (modern, server-first)
Before code, one term:
RSC Boundary (React Server Component Boundary) = the line separating server code from client-side UI code in Next.js App Router.
Now the handler:
export async function GET() { return Response.json({ message: "Hello from Next.js" }); }
Next.js handles:
routing
server execution
JSON response formatting
You focus only on logic.
D. Fetching from frontend
const res = await fetch("/api/hello"); const data = await res.json(); console.log(data.message);
The frontend just consumes the API.
6. Confusions Beginners Don’t Realize Are Blocking Them
These aren’t mistakes: they’re mental blocks.
1. Thinking REST is a technology
It’s just naming/style.
2. Thinking GET/POST are functions
They’re intent signals.
3. Thinking an API endpoint is “special code”
It’s just a function that returns something.
4. Thinking JSON = API
APIs can return anything.
5. Assuming servers “remember” each request
They don’t, every API call is isolated unless you store state.
7. Why APIs Unlock the Rest of Full-Stack
Once APIs make sense:
backend architecture becomes understandable
databases feel logical
auth flows become intuitive
React hooks finally make sense
cloud functions stop being mysterious
AI/LLM integrations become easy (they are just APIs!)
APIs are the bedrock of modern engineering.
8. Final Summary
If you want a single mental model for APIs, this is it:
APIs let software talk to software. Every API call is just: request → logic → data → response. Everything else is details.
Once this mental model is locked in, full-stack development becomes 10x easier, and the next stages (backend, databases, auth) become natural extensions of this foundation.
Writing this gave me a clearer picture of the topic myself, and I’ve kept the diagrams and explanations as simple as possible for anyone trying to understand APIs for the first time, or anyone who just wants a clean revisit. I’ll be writing deeper, more detailed blogs on the same topic soon, so stay tuned, and let’s keep learning together.
Per fornire le migliori esperienze, utilizziamo tecnologie come i cookie per memorizzare e/o accedere alle informazioni del dispositivo. Il consenso a queste tecnologie ci permetterà di elaborare dati come il comportamento di navigazione o ID unici su questo sito. Non acconsentire o ritirare il consenso può influire negativamente su alcune caratteristiche e funzioni.
Funzionale
Always active
L'archiviazione tecnica o l'accesso sono strettamente necessari al fine legittimo di consentire l'uso di un servizio specifico esplicitamente richiesto dall'abbonato o dall'utente, o al solo scopo di effettuare la trasmissione di una comunicazione su una rete di comunicazione elettronica.
Preferenze
L'archiviazione tecnica o l'accesso sono necessari per lo scopo legittimo di memorizzare le preferenze che non sono richieste dall'abbonato o dall'utente.
Statistiche
L'archiviazione tecnica o l'accesso che viene utilizzato esclusivamente per scopi statistici.L'archiviazione tecnica o l'accesso che viene utilizzato esclusivamente per scopi statistici anonimi. Senza un mandato di comparizione, una conformità volontaria da parte del vostro Fornitore di Servizi Internet, o ulteriori registrazioni da parte di terzi, le informazioni memorizzate o recuperate per questo scopo da sole non possono di solito essere utilizzate per l'identificazione.
Marketing
L'archiviazione tecnica o l'accesso sono necessari per creare profili di utenti per inviare pubblicità, o per tracciare l'utente su un sito web o su diversi siti web per scopi di marketing simili.
-Front-Open-By-Golf-Bag-In-Grass-Reviewer-Photo-SOURCE-Ryan-Waniata.jpg)
-Reviewer-Photo-SOURCE-Scott-Gilbertson.png)
