Categorie
Lavoro

Supply Chain Assistant

LOM-Varese, TALENT Tree società specializzata nella ricerca e selezione di profili qualificati ricerca per Gruppo italiano leader nel settore chimico-plastico: Supply Chain Assistant La risorsa inserita nell’area Supply Chain collaborando con il proprio Responsabile si occuperà di migliorarne i processi esprimendo un focus sulle seguenti attività: Gestione delle attività di ri-approvvigionamento degli stock d

Autore: Monster Job Search Results

Categorie
HardwareSoftware

Nvidia Geforce GTX 1060 previewed

Page 1 of 5

Preview: Another great Pascal graphics card

Nvidia is addressing higher mid-range segment with this card and with its $ 249 price tag it may become your next graphics card for 1080p gaming.

Nvidia has introduced its reference GTX 1060 “Founders Edition” and its partners are good to go with custom designs. We will soon have one sample from Gainward. Today we will share our first thoughts about the reference board.  

As was the case with the earlier launched Geforce GTX 1080 and GTX 1070, the Geforce GTX 1060 will also be available as a special limited Founders Edition (which is a fancy new name for reference edition), priced at US $ 299, a US $ 50 premium. 

The card is based on Nvidia’s 16nm GP106 Pascal GPU, which features 1280 CUDA cores, 80 TMUs and 48 ROPs,  6GB of GDDR5 memory paired up with a 192-bit memory interface. The GPU works at up to 1.7GHz on the GPU Boost clock and Nvidia claims it can go as high as 2.0GHz with overclocking, which is impressive. It needs a single 6-pin PCIe power connector, thanks to its low 120W TDP. It also features three DisplayPort 1.4s, a HDMI 2.0b and a DVI display output. 

gtx 1060 gpuz

Autore: Fudzilla.com – Home

Categorie
Energia

Agroenergie: i nuovi chiarimenti delle Entrate

Agroenergie: i nuovi chiarimenti delle Entrate

(Rinnovabili.it) – L’Agenzia delle Entrate torna sulla questione del reddito agrario in ambito delle energie rinnovabili. E lo fa con la risoluzione n. 54 con cui fornisce alcuni chiarimenti in merito all’applicazione della legge finanziaria per il 2006 in riferimento al trattamento fiscale della energia prodotta e venduta in ambito agricolo. La legge stabilisce che la produzione e la cessione di energia elettrica e calorica da fonti rinnovabili agroforestali, fino a 2.400.000 kWh anno, e fotovoltaiche, fino a 260.000 kWh anno, costituiscano attività connesse e si considerino produttive di reddito agrario. Per la produzione di energia, oltre questi tetti si applica una nuova tassazione forfettaria.

Per le agroenergie invece, l’agenzia delle entrate chiarisce che la tassazione su base catastale trova applicazione entro il sopracitato limite a patto che sia rispettato il requisito della prevalenza.

“Infatti, sebbene il comma 423 richiami letteralmente, così come accadeva anche nelle versioni antecedenti della norma in esame, il concetto di “prevalenza” con esclusivo riferimento alla produzione e alla cessione di “carburanti e di prodotti chimici di origine agroforestale”, il documento di prassi sopra richiamato ha chiarito che il predetto requisito deve sussistere anche per la produzione di energia elettrica e calorica da fonti rinnovabili in ragione dell’assimilazione operata dal legislatore di tale produzione alle attività agricole connesse di cui all’articolo 2135, terzo comma, del codice civile“.

Il requisito della prevalenza risulta soddisfatto quando, in termini quantitativi, i prodotti utilizzati nello svolgimento delle attività connesse ed ottenuti direttamente dall’attività agricola svolta nel fondo siano prevalenti, ossia superiori rispetto a quelli acquistati presso terzi.

“In particolare, laddove il confronto quantitativo non sia possibile perché i beni sono di natura diversa, deve farsi riferimento al valore degli stessi, rapportando il valore normale dei prodotti agricoli ottenuti dall’attività agricola svolta nel fondo e il costo dei prodotti acquistati da terzi. Il requisito della prevalenza si considera in tal caso soddisfatto quando il valore dei prodotti propri sia superiore al costo sostenuto per acquistare prodotti di terzi”.

“Laddove non sia possibile effettuare il confronto, in quanto i prodotti non sono suscettibili di valutazione (come ad esempio nel caso dei residui zootecnici), la prevalenza può essere riscontrata effettuando una comparazione “a valle” del processo produttivo dell’impresa, tra l’energia derivante da prodotti propri e quella derivante da prodotti acquistati da terzi”.

Autore: Rinnovabili

Categorie
Economia

In Corso d’Opera: e se la perigliosa attitudine a comprar sui minimi valesse un 4,7%?

by Ascanio L. Strinati

Comprare sui minimi è abitudine sempre molto pericolosa. Due i motivi tecnici che spingono a farlo: comprare a sconto o un rimbalzo  alle viste.

Ce ne sarebbe una terza: dimostrare di essere bravi. Ma i velleitari adepti di questa via vengono di solito indottrinati dal mercato con non poco dolore.

Sottoponiamo ai lettori il caso di Telecom Italia.

Negletta nelle ultime sedute, in questa giornata pesantemente negativa per il nostro listino sembra reggere meglio di altri. Le principali notizie che la riguardano non ci sembrano tali da giustificarne la forza.

A guardare il grafico però ci sembra di scorgere tre aspetti:

1- il massimo di giornata si è fermato prima del gap

2- il nostro MACD proprietario sembra preannunciare rialzo (cross)

3- divergenza di forza relativa piuttosto evidente sul ribasso

telecom

Di contraltare la tendenza in atto è ancora ribassista.

Ciò detto, e qui ci ricolleghiamo sul comprare a sconto,  va evidenziato che comprando l’azione risparmio si genera un rendimento che è calcolabile intorno al 4,7%.

Vediamo di capire bene:

Ipotizziamo di comprare il titolo risparmio su un ritorno di forza, quindi oltre massimi della giornata odierna.

Quindi prima ipotesi: l’azione risparmio seguirà l’andamento dell’ordinaria. (Ragionevole)

Il dividendo della risparmio staccato a giugno è stato 0,0275, il minimo possibile. L’ordinaria non ha staccato dividendo (che non è un bene).

Seconda ipotesi: il dividendo dei prossimi anni sarà di importo similare, se non maggiore (Ragionevole).

Quindi si tratterebbe di comprare TIT Risp. a 0,58.

Ergo: 0,0275 / 0,58 * 100 da appunto il 4,74%.

Spero di essere stato chiaro.

I lettori devono comunque sentirsi liberi, e ci mancherebbe, di segnalare errori e/o chiedere delucidazioni.

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]

Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Autore: Finanza.com Blog Network Posts

Categorie
HardwareSoftware

Microsoft Announces FY 2016 Q4 Results

Microsoft announced their fourth quarter results for their fiscal year 2016. For the quarter, Microsoft had revenues of $ 20.6 billion, which is a 7% decline compared to Q4 2015. Gross margin came in at 61.2%, down from over 66% a year ago. In their Q4 2015, Microsoft wrote down the majority of their Nokia acquisition, so take that into consideration against the rest of their results. Operating income for the quarter was $ 3.08 billion, as compared to an operating loss of $ 2.053 billion a year ago. Net income was $ 3.122 billion for the quarter, compared against a $ 3.195 billion net loss due to the write down at the same time last year. Earnings per share were $ 0.39, compared to a $ 0.40 loss per share last year.

Microsoft Q4 2016 Financial Results (GAAP)
  Q4’2016 Q3’2016 Q4’2015
Revenue (in Billions USD) $ 20.614 $ 20.531 $ 22.180
Operating Income (in Billions USD) $ 3.080 $ 5.283 -$ 2.053
Gross Margin (in Billions USD) $ 12.635 $ 12.809 $ 14.712
Margins 61.3% 62.4% 66.3%
Net Income (in Billions USD) $ 3.122 $ 3.759 -$ 3.195
Basic Earnings per Share (in USD) $ 0.39 $ 0.48 -$ 0.40

For the full fiscal year, Microsoft had revenues of $ 85.32 billion, an operating income of $ 20.182 billion, and net income of $ 16.798 billion.

Microsoft also released Non-GAAP results, which account for deferrals of Windows 10 revenue which is now deferred over the life of a device, as well as removing the restructuring charges, and other expenses. On a Non-GAAP basis, revenue was $ 22.6 billion for the quarter, up 2% year-over-year, and 5% in constant currency (CC). Operating income was $ 6.2 billion, which is down 3% year-over-year, or up 6% CC. Net income was $ 5.5 billion, up 8%, or 23% CC, and earnings per share were up 11% to $ 0.69, or up 27% CC.

Microsoft breaks the company into three segments. Productivity and Business Processes includes Office, which includes both Office commercial and home, as well as Office 365 commercial and home. In addition, this segment includes Dynamics. The second segment is Intelligent Cloud, which includes Server, Azure, Enterprise Mobility, and Enterprise Services. The final segment is More Personal Computing, which includes Windows, devices, gaming, and search.

Productivity and Business Processes grew revenue by 5% (8% CC) to $ 6.97 billion. Gross margin for this segment was $ 3.00 billion, down 5%. Breaking this down a bit further, Office commercial revenue was up 5% (9% CC), and Office 365 commercial seats were up 45% year-over-year. Office 365 commercial continues to have strong growth, at the expense of its traditional buy and use client. Office 365 revenue grew 54% (59% CC), while the non-cloud offering declined 12% (9% CC). The home side is also seeing good growth, with Office consumer growing revenue by 19% (18% CC) year-over-year. Office 365 consumer now has 23.1 million subscribers. The final piece of this segment is Dynamics, which saw a 6% (7% CC) gain in revenue compared to last year. The cloud offering here is also going strong, with CRM Online doubling in seats. Microsoft stated that they now have almost 10 million monthly paid seats for Dynamics, and four out of five new CRM customers choose the cloud version.

Intelligent Cloud had revenues grow 7% (10% CC) to $ 6.71 billion for the quarter. Operating income was down 17% though, to $ 2.19 billion with higher operating expenses and acquisitions. Server and cloud services had revenue up 5% (8% CC), but it was Azure that saw the big gain again. Azure revenue grew 102% (108% CC) while the traditional server products stayed flat. In addition, Microsoft continues to see strong growth in their Azure premium services, with “triple digit” growth for the eight quarter in a row. Enterprise Mobility customers also nearly doubled to 33,000. Enterprise services was also up 12% (14% CC) with growth in their Premier Support Services.

Finally, the More Personal Computing segment, which is still the largest segment by revenue, had revenues decline 4% (-2% CC) to $ 8.9 billion. Operating income in this segment was up significantly to $ 0.96 billion, which is a 59% gain compared to last year. Breaking down this segment, Windows OEM revenue for non-Pro grew by 27% year-over-year, which outpaced the consumer PC market. Microsoft attributes this to more premium devices being sold, which they get more revenue from than, for instance, a $ 199 HP Stream where Windows is no-cost. Windows OEM Pro grew 2%, which is attributed to a stabilization of the commercial PC market and more business devices sold with Pro. Windows volume licensing was up 3% (9% CC), and IP licensing revenue declined. Although not stated, I would attribute this to Microsoft making different deals with Android OEMs to install Microsoft services, rather than just a per-device charge.

On the devices side, revenue was down 35%, but this is almost exclusively the phone unit which is now written off. Phone revenue was down 71% year-over-year. Surface revenue was up 9% driven by sales of Surface Pro 4 and Surface Book. Gaming revenue declined 9% (8% CC) with the discounted price of the Xbox One, and lower console sales. Xbox live monthly active users grew 33% to 49 million.

The final piece of More Personal Computing is Search, which grew revenue 16% (17% CC) thanks to higher revenue per search, and higher search volume. Microsoft stated that over 40% of the search revenue in June was by devices running Windows 10, which helps explain their motivation to offer Windows 10 as a free upgrade for the past year.

Microsoft Q4 2016 Financial Results (GAAP)
  Productivity and Business Processes Intelligent Cloud More Personal Computing
Revenue (in Billions USD) $ 6.97 $ 6.10 $ 8.90
Operating Income (in Billions USD) $ 3.00 $ 6.71 $ 0.96
Revenue Change YoY +5%, +8% CC +7%, +10% CC -4%, -2% CC
Operating Income Change YoY -5% -17% +59%

So there’s a lot of data here, and not all of it will interest everyone, but Microsoft has continued to see strong growth by their cloud segments, and have transitioned well from a traditional software company to one that also offers the services that people want and expect. The cloud revenues continue to grow at a strong pace, and generally at the detriment of their traditional segments. Surface growth of 9% is decent as well, but let’s not forget that a year ago the Surface Pro 4 and Surface Book didn’t even exist, but a 9% gain when the overall PC market is down being a good outcome. With the loss of the Lumia phone business, the negative revenue is still impacting the results, but should not for much longer.

Windows 10 adoption has been strong, with over 350 million devices now running Windows 10. The first big update is coming about a year after the initial release, and we should have more coverage on that soon.

Source: Microsoft Investor Relations

Autore: AnandTech